Posted on 04/19/2015 10:46:32 AM PDT by governsleastgovernsbest
Sure, it was tongue in cheek. But still, it revealed an underlying truth . . . On today's Face the Nation, when Bob Schieffer wondered why the Dems have fielded only one presidential candidate, the Washington Post's Dana Milbank responded by suggesting that Schieffer himself should go for it.
Milbank said there was a "real opportunity" for someone to run against Hillary by filling the Elizabeth Warren slot and then observed that Schieffer would "have some free time after this summer" [since he has announced his retirement.] Schieffer began a Shermanesque response: "if nominated I would not" before dissolving in laughter. Yes, Milbank was kidding, but the notion wasn't absurd in the sense that he knows that Schieffer is a solid liberal. The joke would have fallen flat if he had suggested Schieffer fill a conservative slot in the Republican primary.
View the video here.
(Excerpt) Read more at newsbusters.org ...
Dana Milbank suggests Schieffer should seek Dem prez nomination. OK, he was joking, but it would since everyone knows Schieffer is a big liberal. Ping to Today show list.
Old commie. Bob Shieffer-brains.
It also points out that many people see the presidency as a popularity contest.
Way to suck up, Dana. (Nice name, too)
Skeletor’s politics are no different from Lizzie Warren or Bernie Sanders, so why not?
Well, wouldn’t Schieffer’s entry lower the average age of the Democrats likely to get in the race? (Warren, a frosh at 65, is the Sydney Greenstreet of potential candidates, Biden, Jerry Brown, etc. are also yesterday’s news.)
That’s ALL American politics is....a popularity contest.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.