Posted on 04/17/2015 5:32:27 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
Since the value of gold fluctuates day by day then wouldn't the value of the dollar fluctuate as well?
I would support her campaign just for the Hillary attacks.
I agree, she’s not gonna win (another Senate run makes more sense, we have a ton of weak candidates running, spitting the vote in the stupid all party primary) and she’s not qualified in my opinion to be President or to run for President (having run only 1 race before, and unsuccessfully, though losing by 10 points in CA is nothing to be ashamed of).
But having her attacking Hillary is potentially very useful, so I won’t join the chorus in jumping down her throat.
Curiously, the one candidate who apparently DOES have a shot at winning CA is former US Sec of State Condoleezza Rice. Although I have personal misgivings about her, that’s about the best we’re going to get out of California at present, and beats having yet another leftist imbecile in a seat that hasn’t elected a Republican since Tom Kuchel in 1962 (and as a leftist, he was no prize, either).
I agree, she can go after Hillary ruthlessly and safely as a woman and its fun to watch.
Unfortunately she has disavowed interest.
EIGHT Republicans are listed as running, with more considering. Ugh.
The good news is Kamala Harris is the only prominent rat so far, which is surprising.
Kammy is probably the worst state AG in the nation, second only to Holder at Just-Us. It’s amazing, as horrid as the likes of Babs Boxer is, the Dems manage to vomit up someone even more execrable to follow her.
I’d prefer Fiorina run for the Senate again, thought she’d have a tough time in California. But she could win under the right combination of circumstances.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.