Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DoughtyOne

The mention of “telephoto lens” in the article along with a search of statutes in your state might be of some help. It could be difficult to catch someone taking such pictures, though, examples being private investigators or people who post pictures to creepy web sites. Home security measures might be the most effective way to deal with it (tinted windows, curtains, tactical lighting, outfacing security cameras, etc.).


39 posted on 04/16/2015 12:48:22 AM PDT by familyop (We Baby Boomers are croaking in an avalanche of corruption smelled around the planet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]


To: familyop

I don’t think you or anyone else should have to close your curtains and imprison yourself in your/their home just to keep prying eyes out.

Should you wear revealing clothing or do risque things in front of a window? No, because then you’re enticing folks to check you out.

Just going about normal home life should not open you up to some guy taking photos and publishing them.

As for people in public, I don’t think you have the assumption of privacy there. I will say that I don’t agree with the ability of folks to take pictures of others and sell them for money without permission, even if they are in public.


48 posted on 04/16/2015 9:35:42 AM PDT by DoughtyOne (The question, Jeb Bush? The answer: NO! Rove, is a devious propagandist & enemy of Conservatives!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson