Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why the Confederacy Lives
Politico Magazine ^ | April 08, 2015 | EUAN HAGUE

Posted on 04/10/2015 5:03:22 PM PDT by lqcincinnatus

One hundred-fifty years after Appomattox, many Southerners still won’t give up.

One hundred fifty years ago, on April 9th, 1865, Gen. Robert E. Lee surrendered at Appomattox Court House and the Union triumphed in the Civil War. Yet the passage of a century and a half has not dimmed the passion for the Confederacy among many Americans. Just three weeks ago, the Sons of Confederate Veterans (SCV) appeared before the Supreme Court arguing for the right to put a Confederate flag on vanity license plates in Texas. Just why would someone in 2015 want a Confederate flag on their license plate? The answer is likely not a desire to overtly display one’s genealogical research skills; nor can it be simplistically understood solely as an exhibition of racism, although the power of the Confederate flag to convey white supremacist beliefs cannot be discounted.

Rather, displaying the Confederate flag in 2015 is an indicator of a complex and reactionary politics that is very much alive in America today. It is a politics that harks back to the South’s proud stand in the Civil War as a way of rallying opinion against the federal government—and against the country’s changing demographic, economic, and moral character, of which Washington is often seen as the malign author. Today’s understanding of the Confederacy by its supporters is thus neither nostalgia, nor mere heritage; rather Confederate sympathy in 2015 is a well-funded and active political movement (which, in turn, supports a lucrative Confederate memorabilia industry).

(Excerpt) Read more at politico.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Philosophy; US: Virginia
KEYWORDS: confederacy; dixie; iowacorn; iowatroll; neoconfederate; northstarmom; northstartroll; scv; south
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 581-594 next last
To: FatherofFive

I’m fourth generation Irish and my people fought for the Union. The South wanted to preserve slavery and fought a war to do so. Just like the Brits who fought wars to enslave people.


21 posted on 04/10/2015 5:51:47 PM PDT by jmacusa (Liberalism defined: When mom and dad go away for the weekend and the kids are in charge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: hosepipe

What LBJ said concerning the Civil Rights legislation was “If this bill passes I’ll have them n****rs voting Democrat for the next two hundred years’’.


22 posted on 04/10/2015 5:53:53 PM PDT by jmacusa (Liberalism defined: When mom and dad go away for the weekend and the kids are in charge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: ConorMacNessa

That ain’t the Stars And Bars on either side of that picture you put up there now is it?


23 posted on 04/10/2015 5:55:31 PM PDT by jmacusa (Liberalism defined: When mom and dad go away for the weekend and the kids are in charge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: colorado tanker
The suit was brought by the Sons of the Confed. of Texas.

Historically, Texas was under the govt. of six countries.

Six Flags over Texas is a historical fact. It is something important to them. France, Spain, Mexico, Republic Of Texas, Confederacy and U S.

All are flown in Texas as part of their heritage.

24 posted on 04/10/2015 5:56:18 PM PDT by Tripoli (Tripoli)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ConorMacNessa

“Sons of the Confederacy”

It’s Sons of Confederate Veterans (of which I used to be a member) that does the license plates. “Sons of the Confederacy” is a different outfit, and IIRC, Klan-ish.


25 posted on 04/10/2015 5:59:49 PM PDT by PLMerite ("The issue is never the issue. The issue is the Revolution.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: jmacusa
I’m fourth generation Irish and my people fought for the Union. The South wanted to preserve slavery and fought a war to do so. Just like the Brits who fought wars to enslave people.

And now we are slaves to the "union" again. Freedom is in the Republic. The States. Not the Federal government, British or American.

26 posted on 04/10/2015 6:00:04 PM PDT by FatherofFive (Islam is evil and must be eradicated)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: lqcincinnatus

My Southern Missouri ancestors fought on the side of
the North and I am proud of that fact. However, I respect
the “Stars and Bars” flag and believe that it still stands
for states rights even though as applied to slavery
the states rights aspect was misguided and just plain wrong.
But that certainly does not negate the importance of
states rights.


27 posted on 04/10/2015 6:02:16 PM PDT by Sivad (NorCal red turf ;-))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FatherofFive
Get real. None of us know what it is to be a slave. Stop with the hyperbole already.
28 posted on 04/10/2015 6:02:44 PM PDT by jmacusa (Liberalism defined: When mom and dad go away for the weekend and the kids are in charge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: jmacusa

Old Ben had three ancestors in the Union army — but though the South seceded to keep slavery, it did NOT start the war.

That happened when the North invaded.


29 posted on 04/10/2015 6:04:31 PM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: panzerkamphwageneinz

“It’s alive in me.”

Maybe some antibiotics lol.


30 posted on 04/10/2015 6:05:29 PM PDT by snarkybob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: iowacornman

Exactly.


31 posted on 04/10/2015 6:10:00 PM PDT by Silentgypsy (Mind your atomic bonds.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ConorMacNessa
It is my understanding that many Irish who were fleeing the famine were grabbed coming off the boat and pressed into Union service.

They were sent to fight people who had done them no wrong by the Government which supposedly didn't believe in slavery.

32 posted on 04/10/2015 6:10:25 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: jmacusa

I am tenth generation Irish, County Cork, and my people fought for the South. At Fredericksburg my Irish people probably fought your Irish people. Fortunately, we were behind the Stone Wall.


33 posted on 04/10/2015 6:11:15 PM PDT by lqcincinnatus (Silence in the face of evil is itself evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: jmacusa

My gosh, then what is this strange feeling I have had since BHO has been President?


34 posted on 04/10/2015 6:14:34 PM PDT by lqcincinnatus (Silence in the face of evil is itself evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: lqcincinnatus
The Confederate flag symbolizes Rebellion. A mind set that is becoming more and more popular among the people who see the government as becoming more and more tyrannical.

While I understand the sentiment, I wouldn't fly a confederate flag myself. As a symbol it has been too badly damaged in the court of public opinion and would only distract from the message. It is too closely associated with slavery and racism to be of any value, despite it's larger message.

I like the Betsy Ross flag, or the Gadsden flag better. The Betsy Ross flag represented Independence from Britain, and the Gadsden flag represented the will to fight for freedom.


35 posted on 04/10/2015 6:16:17 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmacusa
Yeah, the states rights to own slaves.

Which Lincoln accepted.

If I could save the Union without freeing any slave I would do it, and if I could save it by freeing all the slaves I would do it; and if I could save it by freeing some and leaving others alone I would also do that.

Just goes to show that the sticking point wasn't slavery, it was Independence. Lincoln was willing to tolerate slavery, but he wasn't willing to tolerate Independence for the Southern States.

36 posted on 04/10/2015 6:20:20 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: jmacusa
I’m fourth generation Irish and my people fought for the Union. The South wanted to preserve slavery and fought a war to do so. Just like the Brits who fought wars to enslave people.

You might check and see if your people were forced to fight for the Union. They grabbed the Irish right off the boats and put them in a war against people who had done nothing to them. Talk about treating people sh*tty.

As for slavery, Lincoln was willing to preserve that, (see post above) but he wasn't willing to allow independence.

37 posted on 04/10/2015 6:23:14 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: PLMerite
Thank you very much for the correction. I meant Sons of Confederate Veterans, and not the other. I am not a member, although I qualify - one of my 2-greats grandfathers, John R. Brison, was a corporal in the 1st Virginia Light Artillery. The man who became his father-in-law was Cpl William Murphy, Battery "C" 5th U.S. Artillery, who was wounded by shrapnel at the Clump of Trees, Gettysburg, 3 July 1863.

I have been researching my family history for almost 40 years. When I come to the passenger lists, most of my immigrant ancestors came over in steerage - iow "coffin ships."

"I am an American fighting man. I serve in the forces which guard my country and our way of life.
I am prepared to give my life in their defense."

38 posted on 04/10/2015 6:26:20 PM PDT by ConorMacNessa (HM/2 USN, 3/5 Marines RVN 1969 - St. Michael the Archangel, defend us in Battle!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
Old Ben had three ancestors in the Union army — but though the South seceded to keep slavery, it did NOT start the war.

That happened when the North invaded.

I am sympathetic to the concept of secession, and I believe the South had the right to do so when they did, (See Declaration of Independence.) but they opened fire on a Union fort. That was the stupidest possible thing they could have done.

Their arrogant pride got the better of them. Had they just went about business as normal, and ignored the Yankee fort commanding the entrance to Charleston, the secession would have eventually become a fait accompli.

Instead they kicked the Hornet's nest, and of course the Hornets were going to respond. At the time, the Northern states had acquiesced to a peaceful secession. The only person who's benefit was served by the attack on Ft. Sumter was Lincoln. Without it, he never would have had a casus belli.

I have read arguments that Lincoln did everything he could think of to provoke them into attacking the fort. Whether this be true or not, it certainly played into his interests.

39 posted on 04/10/2015 6:29:52 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: DiogenesLamp

No one forced my ancestors to fight.


40 posted on 04/10/2015 6:29:55 PM PDT by jmacusa (Liberalism defined: When mom and dad go away for the weekend and the kids are in charge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 581-594 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson