“Crooks, no, opportunists, yes. Try reading the response to which I was responding. The cop isn’t going to be punished by the suit, only the taxpayer. So, yea, it has nothing to do with punishment, only an opportunity to get money.”
I tried and succeeded, thank you. I obviously disagree with your assertion, as evidenced by the way I stated my questions.
Try reading my example. I’ve found your explanation most common among the people who believe cops never lie, and who support the cops by essentially saying the family doesn’t deserve a payout because the cop won’t be punished anyway.
Apparently the monetary judgments aren’t big enough to be respected.
Your reasoning is beyond me. To imply that I believe cops never lie or that the family doesn’t deserve a payout BECAUSE the cop won’t be punished anyway is a real leap. The cop not being punished statement went back to the original response to which I was responding. Obviously we disagree. You believe a family deserves a payout, I do not.