Replies

Meanwhile, I’ve posted links with Walker’s direct quotes over and over again—you know what I say about him is true.

There is an old and applicable saying: DEEDS, NOT WORDS!

Scott Walker has a record that is going to be a nightmare for the RATs to face. He has taken on the unions with great success in his state. He has consistently won in a deep blue state and it's not been a fluke either. He is a business success without being a HAHVAD or Yale graduate. That alone makes him a terrifying proposition to the elites that want to fill his administration in both senior & junior posts from the ranks of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) like the regimes of every single other administration, including Ronald Reagan.

That's the so called shadow government that everybody writes of and stresses over and has since the early 1920's. But a Walker administration would be or could be the first since William Howard Taft and Theodore Roosevelt just before to be without a committed core of people dedicated to creating the New World Order by executive fiat; subtle manipulation of legislation, treaties and agreements.

That he has apparently flip-flopped on some issues is completely irrelevant. That also makes your oft quoted threads irrelevant. Perhaps he was not as knowledgeable on those issues and formed an incorrect opinion. He has a right to gain information and adjust his attitudes and opinions and action plans accordingly. That's the purpose of becoming educated on these topics, especially those that he might not have had to deal with as a governor. I'm a teacher of government and history, this is my arena.

That he is getting money from people that you may not like or agree with. Again, irrelevant. The name of the political game is MONEY. That's what makes the world go 'round. To run a campaign like this you're going to need it by the metric ton! As long as the sources aren't prima facia illegal, then all's fair in love, war and politics. If he takes money from Al Quaeda or the KKK or the drug cartels, that's a different story. But not as much if it comes through a neutral and clean intermediary. He should be able to return it once an illegal source is identified and without lasting impact on his campaign. But just because you don't like a donor, doesn't make that donor or set of donors off limits. There is generally no Quid pro quo especially in the primary. General election may be a different paradigm.

Your persistent attempts to sway others off of him just because you feel maligned by those who do support him, is in my opinion, detestable. How's that feel? To have that word applied to you? We're all freepers here and we all by and large ride with the angels and not against them. We do our cause much harm by all this internecine fighting, especially at this early moments of the political season serves no purpose except to fragment this worthy forum.

Of course there are enemy TROLLS here, and I know you're NOT one of them. They are pretty easily spotted and if need be, ZOTTED by the ever present VIKING KITTY.

I've been watching this process ever since the election.... of 2008. It's my job as a teacher of social studies. I've been watching everybody scramble for "position," and watching them as the issues are raised and developed.

Thus far, Walker has emnerged in my mind as the best candidate to re-take the Oval for the good guys. If I were to name the dream team in my estimation right now, it'd be Walker at the top of the ticket and Cruz as the VEEP. That would give Cruz 8 years to get better acquainted with the process of governing correctly and under the Constitution and best position him to take the Oval for the subsequent 8 years. I figure that 16 years between them might be enough to undo the last 100 years of deliberate democrat corruption and deliberate furtherance of the NWO agenda.