Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Tom Cotton: Bombing Iran would take 'several days'
CNN ^ | April 8, 2015 | eric bradner

Posted on 04/08/2015 12:06:51 PM PDT by balch3

Washington (CNN)A U.S. military campaign against Iran's nuclear facilities would only take "several days" of bombing, Sen. Tom Cotton said Tuesday.

(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: arkansas; cotton; iran; iraq; israel; nucleariran; obama; obamamuslim; rop; waronterror; worldwar3
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-126 next last
To: DoodleDawg

Terrorism is the main commodity for Iran.


101 posted on 04/08/2015 3:53:38 PM PDT by Star Traveler (Remember to keep the Messiah of Israel in the One-World Government that we look forward to coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: shotgun

Didn’t the Chinese steal and test the design?


102 posted on 04/08/2015 3:55:13 PM PDT by wally_bert (There are no winners in a game of losers. I'm Tommy Joyce, welcome to the Oriental Lounge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: SampleMan

They may be underground but they had to build airshafts and access tunnels to get topside again. Bombing the sites would surely take out those exposed structures trapping the workers below ground for some time and I doubt they have long term survival supplies and equipment in that event.


103 posted on 04/08/2015 4:05:55 PM PDT by shotgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: wally_bert

I thought Bubba just sold them the info.


104 posted on 04/08/2015 4:15:32 PM PDT by shotgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: balch3

Once the ayatollas are bombed and dead, what’s left?

Nothing.


105 posted on 04/08/2015 4:39:19 PM PDT by sergeantdave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: balch3

Or one bomb a couple hundred miles up could EMP their sorry butts. Lights out. Do what we say and then the lights come back on. Otherwise tough tacos.


106 posted on 04/08/2015 5:16:31 PM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose o f a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sergeantdave

The weeping brigades will emerge from the rubble.. Nothing new for this party of the globe.


107 posted on 04/08/2015 7:46:13 PM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi - Revolution is a'brewin!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

-y


108 posted on 04/08/2015 7:47:27 PM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi - Revolution is a'brewin!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: WayneS

Radioactive crude oil should make some real high octane gasoline!


109 posted on 04/08/2015 8:04:42 PM PDT by Stymee (Father of 8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Timber Rattler

Iraq is as big and in less than three weeks we wiped out a large percentage of their command and control sectors before ground troops ever went in.


110 posted on 04/08/2015 8:41:56 PM PDT by Fledermaus (The GOP is dead to me! McConnell and Boehner can drop dead!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: balch3

I’m no military expert but while I do agree with Senator Cotton that the U.S. military and whatever allies we could cobble together could indeed severely degrade the Iranian nuclear program through air and cruise missile strikes over a period of a few days that’s only if the Iranians agree to sit back and let us methodically destroy their nuke program. I seriously doubt they’ll be so accommodating. The $64,000 dollar question is how seriously will they retaliate. While any notion of some sort of conventional large scale land invasion of Iran is little more than hyperbole and a classic straw man the worst case and likely scenario is that the situation escalates completely out of control and the U.S. is staring down the barrel of a prolonged air campaign that more resembles the ‘99 NATO bombing of the former Yugoslavia or the ‘91 air campaign over Iraq & Kuwait than Desert Fox. You’re looking at potentially thousands of aim points the USN and USAF have to take out and consequently the U.S. probably loses a handful of aircraft and aircrew that we later have negotiate to get back. And as sure as the sun rises you can count on the liberals and the “world community” to raise holly hell while the U.S. tries to conduct its air campaign.

When all is said and done we probably delay the Iranian nuke program a few years and the Iranians go full tilt towards developing nuclear weapons. The best chance the U.S. had at permanently removing the Iranians as a nuclear threat was during the ‘09 protests in Iran, unfortunately Obama effectively torpedoed that option.


111 posted on 04/08/2015 11:47:17 PM PDT by mrbinga
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg

“Yeah right. Why didn’t we think of that in Iraq or Afghanistan?”

We obviously had a different mission in Iraq and Afghanistan. We weren’t there to destroy their nuclear capabilities. We were fighting the “war on terror” and “nation building”, don’t ya know...


112 posted on 04/09/2015 6:34:11 AM PDT by LaRueLaDue (Remember- allah is the Charles Manson of deities, and mohammed is his Tex Watson. - LysolMotorola)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: balch3; Oliviaforever; NormsRevenge; hosepipe; Star Traveler; Paladin2; PROCON; caww; GraceG; ...

Tom Cotton: Bombing Iran would take ‘several days’

Riiiight. And the Civil War was going to last three weeks. And the Iraq War was going to be a “cakewalk.” And the Vietnam War was going to be a short period of payback for the Gulf of Tonkin outrage.

Goodness I miss Reagan. He didn’t invade any countries, but he still won the Cold War. He did it through containment. What a leftist peacenik! Bush knew so much better how to do foreign policy - invade! Launch pre-emptive war!

Cotton is clearly a Bushite, not a Reaganite.


113 posted on 04/09/2015 7:23:12 PM PDT by WilliamIII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WilliamIII

Grenada?


114 posted on 04/09/2015 7:25:15 PM PDT by Paladin2 (Ive given up on aphostrophys and spell chek on my current device...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: WilliamIII

Cotton is clearly a Bushite, not a Reaganite.


That’s only your opinion. Cotton is a good man.


115 posted on 04/09/2015 7:41:01 PM PDT by laplata ( Liberals/Progressives have diseased minds.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2

Grenada?

That was literally a weekend rescue operation.

Bottom line: Under Reagan, we were in a cold war with the USSR. We beat them without invading them or bombing them. We beat them through containment. Bush knew better - he invaded and occupied Iraq. In doing so, he turned that country into chaos - and a vassal state of Iran. And he also destroyed the GOP, and elected Obama and a Democratic Congress. Result: Obamacare. Bush was an idiot - and Cotton is the same for wanting yet another war in the Middle East.


116 posted on 04/09/2015 7:47:43 PM PDT by WilliamIII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: balch3

If it’s that simple, he and his other idiot politicians should go an do it.

I think it’s at that point we start to find out what happened to all of those man pads we lost in Libya.


117 posted on 04/09/2015 7:49:46 PM PDT by Vermont Lt (When you are inclined to to buy storage boxes, but contractor bags instead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SampleMan

Yeah because they and their proxies will allow that to go unanswered.

Stop playing checkers.

If you are worried that ISIS has cells in the US, then Iran has 100x whatever IS has managed to get here. And Europe.

You are very shortsighted if you think it will end there.


118 posted on 04/09/2015 7:53:46 PM PDT by Vermont Lt (When you are inclined to to buy storage boxes, but contractor bags instead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Paul46360
Here it is in full color.


119 posted on 04/09/2015 7:56:43 PM PDT by MaxMax (Call the local GOP and ask how you can support CRUZ for POTUS, Make them talk!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: shotgun

You recall it incorrectly.

The area would be habitable in weeks. Not years.


120 posted on 04/09/2015 7:58:05 PM PDT by Vermont Lt (When you are inclined to to buy storage boxes, but contractor bags instead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-126 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson