Posted on 04/07/2015 4:06:18 AM PDT by Biggirl
We all should be angry right now about the disastrous “general understanding” with Iran about its nuclear ambitions. According to its terms, Iran will not shut down a single facility, will not dismantle a single centrifuge, and will not ship its stockpile of enriched uranium out of the country.
(Excerpt) Read more at frontpagemag.com ...
Something striking occurred to me a couple weeks ago: there are kids out there under the age of 6 who never lived in this country under a white president. These same kids don’t know what it’s like to live under a prosperous America.
Barack Obama has been the worst disaster visited upon the United States since Pearl Harbor, and I would go so far as to say he’s worse than even the Civil War. He’s the most dishonest, feckless, treasonous occupant of 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue we’ve ever seen. Shame on the 50% of America who put this man in office. SHAME ON THEM!
The 50% that put this POS in office have no shame, and in fact support everything the POS has, and will continue to, do.
The 50% that put this POS in office have no shame, and in fact support everything the POS has, and will continue to, do.
I was with you up to that point. At this point, I will take exception with you. Not the first American voted for the bastard. They may live here. They may call themselves Americans. But what they are is haters of America, traitors to America, parasites, fools, and idiots.
I said 50% of America. I made no indication that I thought those people are American in the truest sense of the word.
The population of America may number over 350 million, but fewer than 175 million of them can truly be called American.
The point being made by the mindless masses of social media is that these children will not know how it feels to be part of the oppressed unprivileged. They really said that. These kids are supposedly more enlightened because their lives are more enriched by the fact that they started under America’s first black president. It’s terrifying to me how convoluted these liberals think, and they want Hillary to run so that they can continue to “enlighten” society with those who “deserve” privilege more than the 250+ years of white men who made this country prosperous.
Yes, thank you.
My son is 19 and I have to explain “how things use to be” and “how things should be” to him on a frequent basis. Thankfully he is not a dupe of the left.
Truer words were never spoken............
I’m frequently called a racist, but my retort is that since they cannot retort with factual evidence to the contrary, what I’ve said is factually true. I don’t care that I’m pointing out that America’s first 43 presidents were white, that’s a fact. It’s also a fact that in the shortest span of time in history, American went from a nascent set of colonies to an industrial, financial, and agricultural powerhouse. Put those two facts together, and yeah, I’m drawing the conclusion that we succeeded handily under the hands of good men, regardless of their race, and then BECAUSE of his race, having been voted into office BECAUSE he was black, Barack Obama has succeeded in undoing over two centuries of success in a matter of 6 years.
That’s enough to make anyone take pause.
Not to mention those that were "too principled" to vote against him - and some of which claim they remain "too principled" to stop the Leftist machine unless Cruz is the other choice.
That and the first black president is on a mission to punish “white America”.
What was most telling to me was when Obama called himself one of the 4 greatest presidents ever... naming Lincoln, FDR, and stunningly LBJ as the other 3. It took me a while to realize what his criteria must have been for his list of “greatest ever Presidents”... and then it became very clear to me: those 4 presidents did more for American blacks than anyone else. Lincoln freed the slaves, FDR created the “New Deal”, and LBJ created the “Great Society”. Obama’s focus is how to give trillions to black Americans (and to Muslims, but he cannot talk about that openly at all), while destroying white America and the middle class.
Not to mention those that were “too principled” to vote against him..........
Same old sad song. Romney is/was the SAME animal politically, just less of a hater of the country. BUT, his goals were the same - national health care, gay rights, expannd the welfare state, ad nauseum. BOTH liberals/socialists.
BUT, you would somehow FEEL better if that socialism came in under those with an R by their name.
The lesser of two evils is STILL evil. Give me a candidate WORTH voting for, and I will.
Perhaps you were running on emotions from the fact that RomneyCare was a basis for ObamaCare and that he opined that he thought that homosexuals should be allowed in the Boy Scouts and missed his qualifiers.
He stated that, while RomneyCare was legal for a State, ObamaCare was unconstitutional as a national/federal program. He also clearly stated, that despite his opinions, the Boy Scouts should be the ones to make the decision, not the government.
Opinons that suck, when tempered by an intent to follow the Constitution, mean we have a disagreement - not a Constitutional crisis.
Then there's the hundreds of other things that Obama has not just wanted, but was willing to go extra-Constitutional with to force them down our collective throats, and the commies he surrounded himself with. I can't imagine Romney deserting Israel or bollixing Iran and the rest anywhere near what Obama did and continues to do.
I was no big Romney fan, but at least I had the brains to be able to make the distinctions about some very concrete differences. if you want to tell yourself that Romney's faults justified a second term for Obama, go ahead and keep up the delusions. Romney had plenty of faults, but he was not hell-bent on "fundamentally changing America" and destroying our status around the world.
If one is not intelligent enough to vote against the pure evil of an Obama, they have no standing to carp about those who actually voted for him (the original target of my comment).
If one is so blinded that one thinks voting for one evil over another is somehow good, then that only serves to illustrate how we got here in the first place.
McCain was the very last time I held my nose and voted AGAINST another, knowing that the one I voted for was almost as big a disaster anyway.
Romney was, for all intents and purposes, a non-different choice over Obama.
And this time the “elites” are trying to make us choose between a Clinton or a Bush. They don’t care which - just one or the other, either of which are a non-different choice over what we have now.
McCain was the very last time I held my nose and voted AGAINST another, knowing that the one I voted for was almost as big a disaster anyway.
Romney was, for all intents and purposes, a non-different choice over Obama.
One gets what one allows - if one allows it, then they need to own up that they decided that an Obama was the best we could do for the country. Anyone who thinks Romney, for all his faults would have been no different than Obama is out of touch with reality. We may have still been on a down ramp, but 5 degrees of drop is better than free fall.
And yet that 5 degrees, applied over several decades is HOW WE GOT HERE. There was NO reversing of course when the R’s had it. Just smaller steps.
And somehow those smaller steps got us conservatives giddy with visions of rolling liberalism back.
It did not happen. We JUST ELECTED an R House, and yet here we are, still allowing Obama free reign/rein.
Tell me again about how the R’s are better for us.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.