Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Colofornian

I want to hear from a Mormon authority.
Is Harry Reid’s behavior consistent
with MORMONISM?


75 posted on 04/02/2015 3:17:27 PM PDT by noah (noah)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]


To: noah
I want to hear from a Mormon authority. Is Harry Reid’s behavior consistent with MORMONISM?

What? BYU inviting Harry Reid to speak there in 2007 wasn't "authoritative" enough?

Actions don't mean anything?

80 posted on 04/02/2015 3:23:45 PM PDT by Colofornian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies ]

To: noah; WilliamRobert; teppe; Normandy; StormPrepper
I want to hear from a Mormon authority.

Good luck!

Most of the FR Mormons have gone into hibernation it seems; and NONE of them (IIRC) ever claimed to be any type of authority on Mormonism.

Heck; it's us CHRISTIANS who are posting all of the lesser known Mormon FACTS on FR!

188 posted on 04/03/2015 4:22:31 AM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies ]

To: noah; WilliamRobert; teppe; Normandy; StormPrepper
I want to hear from a Mormon authority.


Where can we find an 'OFFICIAL MORMON' teaching website??
Official sites are sites supported by LDS officials unless said official sites are considered unofficial by said officials.
 
At that point such sites are unofficial unless officially referenced for official purposes by officials who can do so officially.
 
This should not be misconstrued as an indication that official sites can be unofficially recognized as official nor should it be implied that unofficial sites cannot contain official information, but are not officially allowed to be offical despite their official contents due the their unofficialness.
 
Official sites will be official and recognized as official by officials of the LDS unless there is an official reason to mark them as unofficial either temporally or permanently, which would make the official content officially unofficial.
 
This is also not to imply that recognized sites, often used on FR by haters and bigots cannot contain official information, it just means that content, despite its official status, is no longer official and should be consider unofficial despite the same information being official on an official site elsewhere.
 
Even then the officialness my be amended due to the use of the unofficial information which may determine the officialness of anything be it official or unofficial depending on how and where it is used officially or unofficially.
I hope this clear things up for the lurkers out there.
The haters tend to make things complicated and confusing when it is all really quite crystal clear.
--Ejonesie22

189 posted on 04/03/2015 4:23:20 AM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson