Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: 2ndDivisionVet

For all of those who were panicking because Cruz was at like 4-6% in most polls....and for all of those who were happy about that — you were BOTH wrong to read too much into it.

And I’ll not read that much into this one either, other than to say Walker and Cruz are being helped by this early push - but things will change a hundred times between now and Iowa, let alone SC-Florida and so on.


6 posted on 04/01/2015 10:54:43 AM PDT by C. Edmund Wright (www.FireKarlRove.com NOW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: C. Edmund Wright

Which is why Linda Grahamnesty is planning on running. It sure as hell wasn’t to block Walker or Bush in South Carolina.


12 posted on 04/01/2015 10:56:33 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (You can help: https://www.tedcruz.org/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: C. Edmund Wright
Some of these early polls survey party activists and those who say they have knowledge of the candidates. That would be the establishment, and the establishment favors Jeb. That percentage of support he has, from the elitist-Chamber of Commerce-globalist agenda crowd, might be all he's going to get. The more one learns about Jeb, the LESS there is to like.

Then there's Scott Walker. Mis-steps about ethanol, private statements that negated his new vision for stopping the invasion of the US, on spending state money on a sports stadium and he's becoming a bit more suspicious. I'm wondering if he isn't the establishment "Plan B" if they can't get Jeb or Christie.

Wouldn't it be fun if Ted Cruz and Rand Paul are top contenders when the debates start?

51 posted on 04/01/2015 11:20:59 AM PDT by grania
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson