[Unam Sanctam]

The people who have politicized what should be objective science on this matter need to be tarred and feathered and run out of town, IMHO.

[southern rock]

New Study Is A ‘Death Blow’ To Global Warming Hysteria

The hysteria is agenda driven, therefore no amount of science fact will cause a "death blow". The hysteria will never go away.

[Candor7]

There was absolutely NO sign of Global warming in Eastern Canada this winter.....and that’s a fact. Below freezing temperatures began in mid December of 2014, with no thaw whatsoever until mid March of 2015. In years of the active sun cycle, there always were thaws in January and February , usually with rain.

Not this year. The Arctic is back. Big Time.

Halifax, N.S., usually with balmy winter clime, had the highest snow fall of its recent history.

There is no longer any Global warming, we now are in a cooling phase.

[monocle]

"There are also natural aerosols like clouds and fog. Aerosols tend to reflect solar energy back into space, giving them a cooling effect that somewhat offsets warming from increased CO2 emissions."

The flip side of this explanation is during the night clouds and the like act as a blanket and prevent heat being radiated into space.

[maddog55]

I’m sure a few scientist in this study will mysteriously disappear. It’s not about climate change or global warming it’s about money.

[stockpirate]

HOW MANY BILLIONS OF DOLLARS HAVE BEEN STOLEN AND WASTED ON THIS SCAM ALREADY!

opps sorry for the caps

[Joe Boucher]

No such thing as global warming.
A ploy to take down America and capitalism.

[lormand]

Jail to the scammers.

[TexasFreeper2009]

you mean the science isn’t “settled” ?

SHOCKING!

lol stupid moronic liberals believe any lie they are told.

[BRL]

Those guys are no longer card carrying consensus club members

[aquila48]

Bookmark

[al_c]

There is no proof … or anything anyone can say … to convince the global warming cult that they are wrong.

[__rvx86]

This isn’t a joke, is it? (it’s 1 Apr, after all)

[hinckley buzzard]

The issue of aerosols has bedevilled the global warming industry from the beginning. Already back in 1994 there was a spate of hypotheses to explain the effect, or non effect, of aerosols in the atmosphere. There has never been a general resolution or satisfactory modelling, but the net effect is always that aerosols reduce warming from the "greenhouse gases."

[DuncanWaring]

Ping.

[editor-surveyor]

.
>> “A new study out of Germany casts further doubt on the so-called global warming “consensus” by suggesting the atmosphere may be less sensitive to increases in carbon dioxide emissions than most scientists think.” <<

.
Hmmm, I’m unaware of any actual ‘scientists’ that believe the atmosphere to be “sensitive to increases in carbon dioxide emissions.”

.