If you want on/off this ping list, please let me know.
Please beware, this is a high-volume ping list!
CRUZ or LOSE!Posted on 03/31/2015 12:33:26 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
The blood is in the water. The game is afoot. And the Republicans are brawling.
While Democrats are usually viewed as the undisciplined, fractious party, it is Republicans who sharpen their knives and slice each other up when the White House is at stake.
The struggle is between two groups within the GOP.
The establishment finally recognizes that the party must broaden its base. If the party appeals to only white, Christian conservatives, it will wind up as a regional party, capable of winning Senate and House seats but incapable of winning a national election.
We must nominate a presidential candidate who can reach across racial, religious, cultural and ideological lines, the establishment says, and so the moderate middle is the place to be.
The far right of the party, especially the religious right, hears this and goes crazy. It says we keep nominating moderates and we keep losing! We nominate Mitt Romney and we lose. We nominate John McCain and we lose.
It is time to wake up and coalesce around a true Christian conservative who is unafraid to endorse Christian values and talk about God and Jesus Christ, it says. This is where America is and that is where the Republican Party needs to be.
The establishment has almost always won this fight, by the way. The religious right of the Republican Party has not gotten the nominee it has wanted since Ronald Reagan. (And he wasn’t religious personally.)
But this time could be different, the right says. Hillary Clinton is going to be very, very vulnerable in the 2016 general election. Voters by then will have had eight years of a Democratic presidency and they are weary to the bone.
So this is the perfect time to pick a true conservative, a true Christian conservative, who will take this country back. This is no time to be muddling around in the middle, searching for moderate voters who will never vote Republican anyway.
And so the knives have come out.
As Trip Gabriel wrote in The New York Times on March 25: “Fearing that Republicans will ultimately nominate an establishment presidential candidate like Jeb Bush, leaders of the nation’s Christian right have mounted an ambitious effort to coalesce their support behind a single social-conservative contender months before the first primary votes are cast.”
So when Ted Cruz, a right-wing, Christian conservative announced for the presidency on March 23 (at a Christian university founded by Jerry Falwell, no less) the establishment instantly fought back.
The establishment isn’t called that for nothing. It is established. And the word went out on Cruz: bright, articulate and without any record of accomplishment. A loser, in other words.
Charles Krauthammer said on Fox News: “Cruz talks about you have to walk the walk, rather than talk the talk. You have to have done something, but that’s not his record in the Senate.”
And The Wall Street Journal editorial page, which is as Republican establishment as you can get, recoiled in horror at the idea of Cruz as nominee and dismissed him as another — you are reading this right — Barack Obama.
“Can a smart, articulate, 40-something first term Senator trained in constitutional law, who disdains his colleagues and lacks executive experience, make the leap to the White House?” the editorial began. “President Obama proved it was possible in 2008, and now Ted Cruz will try to show that a Republican can do it too …”
But while Obama got to the White House, the editorial strongly suggested that Cruz will not. And that’s because the religious right is hopelessly wrong in its assessment of what it takes to win a presidential election in this country.
The editorial said it is hopeless for a Republican to depend solely on the Republican base to win in 2016 and that a Republican nominee must reach beyond the base, be inclusive and appeal to minorities and the “working class.”
(I grant you that it is an open question as to how closely connected the editorial writers of the Journal are to the American “working class.”)
Cruz’s “hard-edged message against immigration” may help him in the Republican primaries, the editorial said, but “it is a dream come true for Hillary Clinton.”
“Mr. Cruz’s challenge will be showing that his polarizing style is a better bet than the conservative governing success that many of the others [in the GOP presidential field] have already had.”
The religious right, however, does not care about sniffy editorials. This time, it believes, the party will finally wake up and smell the blood.
“Conservatives smell blood in the water,” Kellyanne Conway, a Republican pollster, told the Times. “They feel they’ve got the best shot to deny the establishment a place.”
The establishment, they believe, must be elbowed aside like the geezers that they are. It doesn’t matter how much money the establishment can raise or how many voters it can deliver. The Republican establishment does not understand religious America and the true power it has.
“Far too many Christians have ceded the public arena to people that aren’t believers,” Cruz told David Brody of the Christian Broadcasting Network.
And that is the secret weapon.
“God isn’t done with America yet,” Cruz said at his announcement.
And the religious right isn’t done with the Republican Party.
It certainly does.
Yikes! He stole my tagline!
I’m thinking that Cruz starts speaking Spanish and the liberal heads explode.
He will, and they will : )
Too bad ‘ol Mitchy Mac isn’t even 1/1,000,000th as tough on dumbocrats as he was on his Republican primary election opponents last Fall.
SUCCESS by GOP???? They have defined success DOWN....and now the WSJ is merely the mouthpiece of the one world corporatists. Let's CRUZ!!!!
Sounds like Grahanesty is running too, that complicates things.
Dr. Krauthammer is a Democrat who worked for President Carter and Vice President Mondale. Look it up.
I did not know that.
CRUZ or LOSE!I would have too.
Once released, I would have had the CIA track these guys where ever they went - and death would have followed behind them.
Meanwhile, I would have tried and shot Bergdahl for desertion.
Which has always been the real battle hasn't it?
That is possible, but the long-suffering socons deserve their shot to prove it false.
You posted an interesting item yesterday where the author pointed out how many more self-declared Independents there are now than ever before, polled at 42 percent! The writer wrongly assumed that those Independents were the same as "middle of the road" voters, and so the Republican party had to take that tack to catch them. I think it's the same here -- the writer assumes that anyone NOT self-identifying as a Christian conservative is either moderate or to the left, and that's the tack to get them.
The reality is that a very large number of Americans are on the opposite side of the road as Democrat/Republican strategies. A very large number of Americans only want one thing: LESS government, LESS nanny state, LESS tyranny, MORE freedom, MORE independence, MORE autonomy from government. A large number of Americans resent the overburden of government Democrats and Republicans are building constantly, and they want to vote for the party, the candidate, the concept, that says, "SMALLER, less government!"
That the guy who is calling for it, Cruz (I hope and trust, anyway), happens to also be an avowed Christian, is so much the better. His being a Republican is as much a liability as it is a benefit.
That there is even this divide IN the Republican party to such a degree, shows that it is defunct.
Yep.
Ping to my post 16. Yep.
I'd love to see articles like this about the Democrat party............
Ain't gonna happen because the MSM knows how to tweak the purists of the political right into eating themselves.......
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.