Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 03/28/2015 7:54:09 PM PDT by GIdget2004
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: GIdget2004

I would assume the current law is perfectly clear, at least its intent is, and that Pence is looking to somehow backtrack.


2 posted on 03/28/2015 7:55:47 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GIdget2004

Here comes the big back off as usual.


3 posted on 03/28/2015 7:56:15 PM PDT by headstamp 2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GIdget2004

What is it with these so-called conservative leaders that once they do the right thing, they don’t have the courage of their convictions?

Am I ready this wrong?

Was there anything wrong with the original bill he signed?


4 posted on 03/28/2015 7:56:21 PM PDT by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GIdget2004

Pence going wobbly.


5 posted on 03/28/2015 7:57:35 PM PDT by Timber Rattler (Just say NO! to RINOS and the GOP-E)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GIdget2004

We don’t need the Two Percent playing their games again.


7 posted on 03/28/2015 8:01:55 PM PDT by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GIdget2004

Pence is good if he resigns.


8 posted on 03/28/2015 8:05:28 PM PDT by Lisbon1940 (No full-term governors)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GIdget2004
Time to "compromise!" Which means that Chicago liberals couldn't stand that neighboring Indiana passed a law that 19 other states (including my own Alabama) already have on the books, so these libs applied personal pressure to Pence and others, and now he's ready to back down.

Just my guess. Yours is as good as mine.

13 posted on 03/28/2015 8:28:16 PM PDT by backwoods-engineer (Blog: www.BackwoodsEngineer.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GIdget2004
The language of the law is pretty clear, and simple... it parrots the first clause of the First Amendment:

"a governmental entity may not substantially burden a person's exercise of religion".

THAT is what the LGBT folks are screaming about, and somehow getting every business in the country to make statements against.

We are truly in interesting times.

18 posted on 03/28/2015 8:49:05 PM PDT by Teacher317 (We have now sunk to a depth at which restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GIdget2004

Angies list would be bankrupt by now if not for bail outs and Indianapolis giving them anything disturbed me anyway. Businesses can get crap reviews for making customers pay the bill. I say let them go.


22 posted on 03/28/2015 11:28:41 PM PDT by enduserindy (A painted trash can is still a trash can.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GIdget2004

I wonder what this law means if you are Muslim...is this one that can backfire somehow, forcing Muslim prayers in schools, for instance? Just curious. Nobody should have the right to tell anybody how to run a privately-owned business. Shouldn’t even need a law for that...just make a law to expunge all liberals...one law could fix everything.


27 posted on 03/29/2015 4:42:57 AM PDT by ThePatriotsFlag ($$$$$ Don't Defund the Government...Defund Obama and his illegal policies $$$$$)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson