Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: FredZarguna

one word for you Fred.... Comeuppance

chew on that for a bit...and in fairness you are not the only one..caraway rye and a bunch of others as well


96 posted on 03/28/2015 7:44:25 AM PDT by Chauncey Uppercrust (AMANDA KNOX IS INNOCENT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies ]


To: Chauncey Uppercrust; FredZarguna

The conviction of Guede was based on him being an accomplice with others. It was based on the fact that he could not have acted alone and did not act alone.

For one thing, the break-in was found to be staged, and Guede’s footprints lead right out the door. So, you have to ask yourself who cleaned up after him, who staged the crime scene after the murder, and who staged the break-in? (Glass was found on top of the ransacked things, so it was broken after the ransacking.) And who would have the motive to do all these things?

The only two other suspects are Knox and Sollecito.

From the beginning, Knox kept changing her story and lying, even implicating an innocent man. Knox’s own blood was found mixed with the victim’s blood in the bathroom and another bedroom. And DNA from Sollecito was found on the victim’s bra hook.

The notion that they’re innocent - not involved in any way - just does not add up:

http://themurderofmeredithkercher.com/Main_Page


97 posted on 03/28/2015 10:18:33 AM PDT by Tired of Taxes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson