Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SunkenCiv
Henry VII had no legitimate claim to the throne, and had to marry the sister.

People tend to forget that Tudor's ONLY real claim to the throne came through the Beaufort line of John of Gaunt and that its legitimacy has always been questioned.

If the princes were a threat, obviously the princess was as well — yet Richard III didn’t get rid of her.

Precisely! Richard would have had no reason to kill the Princes and allow their sisters to live. Henry Tudor's pledge to marry Elizabeth of York would have been a death sentence for her if Richard was the type of person who would murder his brother's children purely for convenience. However, Henry Tudor had every reason to murder the Princes and allow the Princesses to live.

55 posted on 03/30/2015 10:32:25 AM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]


To: wagglebee

The sister was never a rallying point for rebellion.
Male primogeniture was taken so overwhelmingly seriously that she meant nothing.


57 posted on 03/30/2015 11:09:27 PM PDT by FredZarguna (It looks just like a Telefunken U-47 -- with leather.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson