Replies

My understanding is that the comments were made at a private gathering and there are three sources saying Walker made comments that would not set well with anti-invasion conservatives. My suggestion is that the way to clear it up is to release the text of what he said.

I further suggested that it's unwise for candidates to make statements in private. I also wondered if the way to avoid saying things potential supporters would disagree with is to actually believe what they're saying.

Please, correct me as to what I have wrong.

From what I have seen, Grania knows exactly how it came about. Walker is having private meetings, just like yesterday with the Phoenix Chamber of Commerce. Then leaks start to happen because he is potentially making deals with an organization that is transparently open borders and pro amnesty, in private. His meetings with Establishment groups and organizations is what is at play here.

Just like when Walker is for ethanol subsidies and then against them before he is for them again. All only because of who he is speaking with. Convictions, convictions, convictions. I would far more be trustful of any candidate that takes a position and stands on it than one whose positions whip around the mast like an untethered sail in a hurricane.

How about an honest debate on vetting all their public and private stances and convictions before taking sides and choosing now? This is the same thing that happened to the Rick Perry supporters in the last round. And you, my dear, are one of the worst of staking a claim before even doing any geotech, then using your collection of little sound bite links to assail anybody else rather than engaging in any retrospect to where you plant your flag. Be mindful a mudslide can just as easily happen in the desert as it can on the Kalifornja coast.