"Gee, maybe a little global warming won't be so bad after all. Besides, they can always put some ice on it."
Well she’ll starve.
I’ve heard of men having sex with walruses (consensual, of course), but there are limits to even the strongest stomach. Aren’t there?
It is more likely that the Warren Buffet led merge of Kraft Foods and Heinz Foods will cause women to trade sex for food.
Babs Lee a Castro Communist who was caught handing over Leahy committee secrets to Castro in the 1980’s when she worked for her Communist mentor who she succeeded in that Oakland House seat.
Carry on.
Hey, baby, I’m really hot!! Wanna buy me a burger??
Bill Clinton traded jobs for sex. A woman should demand a judgeship or top position with Arkansas power and light, not settle for just food.
So dinner and a movie is now a bad thing? ;>)
Liberal women: they will try anything to get laid. Of course, if things work out and they get knocked up, it’s profit-making venture for them— the government will either provide multiple handouts or a court will order child support. So while some view this as apocalyptic, it’s actually just marching orders from the mother ship. Keep that rascal wrapped, boys...the libtard women are coming!
Oh Lord, please spare me! The “War on Women” meme in the guise of AGW! Two gigantic lies told by a California Communist. Have Americans really become this dumbed-down?
More specifically, the states have never delegated to the feds, expressly via the Constitution, the specific power to regulate, tax and spend for intrastate climate purposes. This is evidenced not only by the Constitutions silence about global warming, but also by the following Supreme Court clarification of Congresss limited power to lay taxes.
Congress is not empowered to tax for those purposes which are within the exclusive province of the States. Justice John Marshall, Gibbons v. Ogden, 1824.
And to prevent Congress from laying unconstitutional taxes, taxes which cannot be justified under Congresss constitutional Article I, Section 8-limited powers, the Founding States had done the following. The Founders had not only established the Federal Senate, but had given the power to elect senators uniquely to state lawmakers. This was so that federal senators could protect their states by killing House appropriations bills (1.7.1) which Congress cannot justify under its Section 8 limited powers, global warming issues for example, such bills not only stealing state powers, but also state revenues associated with those powers.
But as a consequence of the 17A, low information citizens go home after using their 17A power to vote for their federal senators and watch football, oblivious that the federal senators that they elected are doing the following. Their senators are working in cahoots with the corrupt House to rob citizens wallets by appropriating taxes that Congress cannot justify under its Section 8-limited powers, taxing and spending for global warming purposes being one glaring example.
So if Rep. Barbara Lee is really concerned about appropriating taxes in the name of scientifically unproven claims of global warming, then here is how she must establish the federal governments power to regulate intrastate climate issues within the framework of the Constitution that she has sworn to protect and defend.
Rep. Barbara Lee must lead Congress to propose a climate change amendment to the Constitution to the states. And if the states choose to ratify Rep. Lees amendment then the feds will have the constitutional authority to tax and spend for climate change purposes and Rep. Lee will be a hero.
Getting back to 17A, and with all due respect to Constitution-respecting justices, also consider that if that amendment had never been ratified that there would probably be all different faces on the Supreme Court at this time.
The 17th Amendment needs to disappear.
Bring on the heat! /s
Sex for food? I’m in for a meat lovers pizza with extra bacon! Whaddya mean I’ve got it backasswards?
She is so cringe makingly stupid. It gives me a headache just to read her idiocy
Global Warming on Free Republic
So what does propose? Increase the size of Congress to absorb the increased supply of whores?