Posted on 03/26/2015 1:07:16 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
The Wall Street Journal recently published a strange piece called “Why Cable TV Beats the Internet, For Now.” Despite pay-TV losing 1.4 million customers last year, it seems the WSJ is device-challenged and unwilling to embrace the obvious future dominance of Internet streaming media. And the war to discount your cost for pay-TV is heating up.
Geoffrey A. Fowler of the WSJ’s Person Tech section describes himself as a “tech columnist and someone who watches enough TV to own a Snuggie.” He acknowledges that cord-cutting allows cheaper choices than pay-TV, but strangely he worries that “Internet TV means juggling gadgets.”
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
Well, it does make you THINK a little more. Memory banks start gaining muscle.
NOT TRUE....any live sports worldwide can be accessed and viewed on-line...ANY sport not just American sports...Anything you really want to watch can be viewed just by having broadband....if you want specific sites ...just mail me privately would be happy to share and help you save your cash....my exact outlay for Time Warner over the last 12 months was 419.88 to the penny and not one red cent was to any tax...
Add netflix and or Hulu+ and a OTA HDTV antenna and you have plenty to watch. We added a Chromecast for $35 and we can cast any streaming chrome tab (full screen)to the TV. Anything you can stream on the computer we can watch on TV.
Plus the beta channels are hit and miss. One episode of a tv show works, the next one doesn't...etc.
I will be getting a Roku soon and begin testing.
I'm not giving up. Again, thanks.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.