Ah yes the ole “Saddam was a stabilzing force” bullcrap.
“The question is: What policies are most likely to stop — or minimize to the greatest degree possible — the damage this terrorist group can do to Americans and our friends?”...
Well friends, there won’t be any such policies until odumbo and his ilk have been totally eliminated and I mean across the board, GONE!!! Then and only then will ISIS/ISIL begin to see “where the bear dumps in the woods”, I just hope it won’t be too late.
OK so we are all calling it ISIL now?
Good one CNN
Except that ISIS/ISIL did not exist when we invaded Iraq
Defied 16, yes 16, UN Resolutions in attempt to build a nuclear weapon before Bush stopped his ass.
One stopped nuclear proliferation in the ME, while the current one plans to expand it.
When a “Nation Building” task is stacked on top of ROE that prevent you from defending yourself, only failure will ensue.
“Fight, win, leave.”
THAT is how is should be done.
For those who need their dots connected (and the reason for this lying article):
ISIL did not exist until the Syrian civil war
ISIL immerged from the side that opposed Assad
The side that opposed Assad was supported by the Obama administration.Obama continues to oppose Assad
Evidence exists that shows the Libyan arms were transferred to the Syrian opposition during the Syrian civil war.
There is reason to believe that Ambassador Chris Stevens was in Benghazi to assist in those weapons transfers.