Posted on 03/24/2015 2:12:45 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
Not bothering with an "exploratory committee," Senator Ted Cruz (R-Texas) has jumped with both feet into the 2016 presidential race.
Cruz openly identifies with the Tea Party, and has done so since before his upset victory in the Republican primary for the U.S. Senate in 2012, when he garnered big-name endorsements from then-Texas Congressman Ron Paul, Senator Rand Paul, former Senator Rick Santorum, and then-Senator Jim DeMint.
In his speech anouncing his candidacy Monday at Liberty University in Virginia, Cruz offered the students and faculty of the conservative Christian college some red meat:
Imagine abolishing the IRS.... Imagine a president that finally, finally, finally secures our borders ... instead of a federal government that seeks to dictate school curriculum through Common Core. Imagine repealing every word of Common Core.
Cruz's law professor at Harvard, liberal Alan Dershowitz, has called his former student "off-the-charts" brilliant, and Cruz went on to clerk for Supreme Court Chief Justice William Rehnquist. He was educated in private Christian schools and spent much of his teen years as part of a group of students in the Free Market Education Foundation, who studied such libertarian-conservative icons as Milton Friedman, Friedrich Hayek, Frederic Bastiat, and Ludwig von Mises.
When Texas Governor George W. Bush was elected president in 2000, Cruz joined the administration in the Department of Justice. Despite this Bush connection (which understandably raises some eyebrows among conservatives who have suffered from this family for a generation now), Cruz later opposed the Bush administration, after he was no longer employed there. President Bush tried to force the state of Texas to honor a decision by the International Court of Justice (ICJ), in the case. The Bush administration supported the ICJ in an effort to reopen the cases of 51 Mexican nationals who had been convicted of murder, and were on death row in the Lone Star State. The ICJ argued, and Bush agreed, that Texas had failed to allow Mexican nationals proper access to the Mexican consulate, but Cruz, acting as a lawyer for Texas, defeated the Bush administration before the U.S. Supreme Court in a 6-3 decision. The Court held that the ICJ simply did not have any jurisdiction over U.S. domestic law.
Cruz also filed an amicus brief on behalf of attorneys general in 31 states in the Heller decision, which struck down the ban on handguns in the nation's capital in violation of the Second Amendment.
In other issues, Cruz has taken strong conservative positions on social issues, tempered with respect for state sovereignty. He opposes same-sex marriage, and the legalization of marijuana, but believes both issues should be left to state discretion. He is also pro-life.
In international affairs, Cruz has said that he positions himself "somewhere in between" the non-interventionist views of Senator Rand Paul (who is considering a presidential bid himself) and the bellicose interventionist rhetoric of Senator John McCain. Non-interventionists can hope that a Cruz administration would be much closer to Senator Paul than Senator McCain, and in fact, Cruz did oppose American intervention into the Syrian civil war, arguing that the United States had no "dog in the fight."
Cruz also authored a bill to prohibit the use of drones to kill American citizens inside the United States, and rose to support Rand Paul when the Kentucky senator staged his famous filibuster on that issue.
At other times, Cruz has not positioned himself near Paul in foreign affairs and the use of the military. On the contrary, he has even pointedly said that he disagrees with Paul. While Cruz achieved a solid 89 percent score on the "Freedom Index" of The New American magazine, he has demonstrated a penchant for intervention. On March 27, 2014, he voted for a bill to provide $150 million in direct aid for Ukraine. The bill would also provide for loan guarantees — meaning that should the Ukrainians not pay back the loan, which is likely, the American taxpayer would foot the bill.
Speaking to Stuart Varney on Fox News Insider, Judge Andrew Napolitano conceded that while he liked Cruz's views toward the Constitution overall, he has some concern with his position on the use of American military forces overseas. "I think Ted Cruz would probably join all the other Republicans but Rand Paul with the idea that we should — to use Woodrow Wilson's phrase — make the world safe for democracy," Napolitano told Varney, lamenting that this will lead to "perpetual death and perpetual war." Napolitano added that war should be a last resort to defend our nation, and should not be used "just because we don't like what's going on in other countries."
The Texas senator can expect opposition from the GOP establishment, which will no doubt support former Governor Jeb Bush of Florida. For example, Greg Valliere, a political advisor to Wall Street firms, boldly predicted that Cruz could not carry more than a dozen states, should he actually win the Republican nomination. On the other hand, the establishment will most certainly approve of Cruz's position of giving President Obama (or any other president) "fast track authority" on trade. Fast track authority certainly violates the spirit of the Constitution by transferring more power to the executive branch in the making of trade agreements with other nations. (See here and here for recent New American articles on these dangerous trade agreements.)
Cruz's Cuban ancestry probably contributed to his capture of 40 percent of the Hispanic vote in the 2012 Texas senate contest.
A great concern for conservative constitutionalists is whether Cruz would follow the U.S. Constitution as president, or whether he would conduct himself as have several of our recent presidents, both Democrat and Republican, who have run roughshod over that precious document on a regular basis.
Absolutely picture perfect.
Very sweet by far.
110% improvement over the present occupiers.
Anyone else see the pink suit, and freeze - ??
Memories of the JFK era - -
However, I do question whether or not he is a Natural Born Citizen. Yes, I understand that his mother is a US citizen, but his father isn't. Didn't the Founders intend for BOTH parents to be US citizens in their definition of Natural Born Citizen at the time the candidate was born rather than just one? What is the TRUTH here...can anyone provide me a link?
I know that Cruz was born in Canada, but I don't believe that the place of a person's birth had anything to do w/ whether they were a Natural Born Citizen or not, it was the citizenship if their parents instead. I thought that the Founders wanted to make sure that anyone who became POTUS was raised in a family whose hearts beat for America rather than another country.
You bet...!!!!!!!
So does he already have Secret Service protection? Bunch of whacks on the other side.
I don’t know. The Presidency has a tendency to either elevate or shrink a person in historic proportions.
He has a good foundation.
Hell, Odumbo is not natural born, and HE wasn’t a problem for anyone on the left. That being the case, I honestly don’t think we need to look too hard at Cruz, given that the precedent has been set by Bammy.
Wouldn’t it be cool to have a Constitutional POTUS that would make fun of Obama every chance he got?
Let’s say a POTUS Cruz took Obama’s well-known phrases & used them against him. Notice that, just like Obama, Cruz has 2 daughters. If there was an a WH event honoring the Boy Scouts (or some other group that irritated the Progressives something fierce!) & one of the Boy Scouts received an award for bravery (or whatever), Cruz would say. “If I had a son...”. Use the phrase for something PATRIOTIC rather than praising a dead thug as Obama did, LOL.
Maybe during his Inauguration speech Cruz could trash Obama for his treasonous actions, his doubling the debt, his kissing the arse of our enemies, etc., etc. & point his finger at Obama while he was sitting there & say “THAT MAN is the reason why you can’t have good things...”.
He would make a GREAT president. It’s really simple: He’s off the charts brilliant, fully understands the Constitutional system as it was intended and fully committed to restoring it to full vigor. After that, all he needs to do is to appoint good, well qualified people to fill key jobs, throw out all the careerist bureaucrats at every level and make all decisions going forward guided by the Constitution and the concept of liberty as expressed in the Declaration.
This is true of how Reagan governed. He didn’t come to the job of governor as an experienced executive but was guided by principles, character and a good mind. Cruz, IMHO, equally principled and probably a far greater mind than Reagan, so he can more than make up for any intangibles that Reagan had.
You could expect an Impeachment if he sneezed in the wrong direction.
My border collie would make a better president than 0bama.
Question is, if he doesn’t win POTUS, could he win his Senate seat again come 2018???
/johnny
/johnny
‘Cruz’s Cuban ancestry probably contributed to his capture of 40 percent of the Hispanic vote in the 2012 Texas senate contest.”
Does anyone know if they Hispanics voted against the dem Lt. Gov. and for Cruz, simply because he sounded like he was Mexican?
I sure hope not and they voted because they were impressed with his record and saw that he had the values they admired.
Cruz is the only one that will stand up to the Republicrats.
Besides your question, do you know what you’d call a Republican nominee who got 40% in a national election?
Lets face it...Obama hasn't set the bar very high.
Certainly better than what we have now. Hell, a dead skunk in the middle of the road would be better than we have now.
Cruz is an evangelical Christian, which I’m very afraid makes him unelectable in in today’s post-Christian America. The very last thing that America’s apostate protestant denominations and our sex-crazed general public want is an evangelical born again Christian president.
Cruz’s Cuban ancestry probably contributed to his capture of 40 percent of the Hispanic vote in the 2012 Texas senate contest.
In the last few national elections Hispanics voted 70% democrat plus or minus a few % points.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.