To: xzins
“According to her bio at The Federalist, Barwick is a “former gay-marriage advocate turned children’s rights activist” and is “a wife and mother of four rambunctious kids.”
No mention if she is ‘married’ to a man?
26 posted on
03/22/2015 6:49:13 AM PDT by
Beagle8U
(NOTICE : Unattended children will be given Coffee and a Free Puppy.)
To: Beagle8U
Ah--- since she's advocating for children's right to their natural father, it seems unlikely she'd choose to be "married" to a woman.
"Marriage" always means --- by definition--- a man and a woman.
34 posted on
03/22/2015 7:19:24 AM PDT by
Mrs. Don-o
(God's grace has been revealed, and has made salvation possible for the whole human race. (Titus 2))
To: Beagle8U
From
this article at The Federalist:
Growing up, and even into my 20s, I supported and advocated for gay marriage. It’s only with some time and distance from my childhood that I’m able to reflect on my experiences and recognize the long-term consequences that same-sex parenting had on me. And it’s only now, as I watch my children loving and being loved by their father each day, that I can see the beauty and wisdom in traditional marriage and parenting.
Apparently she is married to a man.
45 posted on
03/22/2015 12:57:42 PM PDT by
upchuck
(The current Federal Governent is what the Founding Fathers tried to prevent. WAKE UP!! Amendment V.)
To: Beagle8U
It doesn’t say “formally”. It says “former”.
Huge difference.
46 posted on
03/23/2015 4:46:58 AM PDT by
xzins
(Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It -- Those Who Truly Support Our Troops Pray for Their Victory!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson