[rktman]

Hmmmm. I guess “vetting” is only for non liberals as opposed to liars who don’t feel the need to prove anything about themselves or their backgrounds. And if you call them on it you’re just being racis’.

[EvilCapitalist]

After Mitt Romney, and Chris Christie, I’ve always thought never trust a Republican politician from a Blue State.

[sickoflibs]

Actually yours is the third posting of this same Breitbart thread, the first has almost 200 comments and the second was locked by a mod after about 70 comments.

[bigbob]

So vet away.

Here’s a news flash: Ronald Reagan was a democrat until 1962.

[SkyDancer]

Vette the Muslim-In-Chief first ....

[NEMDF]

3rd Post of this article so far.

[USS Alaska]

"What does he really stand for and is he fully equipped to bear the slings and arrows of his enemies on a national and global scale? Yes, he fought Big Labor and has managed his state well. But grass-roots activists in his state have long been warning me of his ideological gymnastics on core issues: immigration and education.

Yews, he fought big labor BUT, BUT, BUT...

I'm not saying Scott Walker is perfect, in fact, he's not even my guy, Ted Cruz is the only one I've sent money to, but this is crazy.

Every time someone begins to emerge, people have been coming from the woodwork to tear them down.

Michelle Malkin must be being paid by some one to rip on Walker, because all these "experts" are on some ones pad.

There is no one without an agenda, and those are bought and paid for.

[Bayan]

And in the Gran Old Party tradition some continue to eat their own.

[Servant of the Cross]

Malkin and Boyle launch into Walker. A head scratcher to me. Cruz is my guy but I just don’t get this Walker attack from the right. One, it’s too early. Two, let’s attack the Left not one of the top three conservative contenders.

[RitaOK]

Malkin is making assertions without facts. I wanna hear her footnotes on each of her complaints.

She’s a strong writer and I have always liked her style, but calling anyone “naive and stupid” because they don’t fall into the back of her conspiratorial tomato truck begs the question. Where is all of her supporting evidence? Paul Ryan? Heck, he was GOP BEFORE he ran for anything and simply STAYED that way. He didn’t have to be “molded”.

For instance where is the evidence of GOP running Walker to the Establishment for “molding”? If it’s so pervasive, surely there is evidence of that.

Let him run the race for crying out loud. He beats Jeb Bush and he is a hell of a lot more trouble for Hillary Clinton than has been realized yet, IMHO.

[JmyBryan]

His entire career as governor in Wisconsin has been an investigation. I know of no other politician who has ever had such scrutiny.

You don’t think he’s conservative? Fine. But his record is right there and he’s had more money and effort used against him than anyone in modern history.

If that’s not vetting, what is?

[Teacher317]

ALL candidates should be vetted, and very thoroughly. It has been very clearly proven that neither the DNC nor the RNC will do that job for us anymore. I'm with Michelle Malkin on this one.

[DungeonMaster]

I really appreciated Newt at the primary debates saying “Every person up here would be much better than Obama”.

[olezip]

Nationally syndicated conservative columnist Michelle Malkin, founder of the website Twitchy, tells Breitbart News that Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker—a potential 2016 GOP presidential candidate—needs to be vetted.

Nationally syndicated conservative columnist Michelle Malkin, founder of the website Twitchy, should be telling Breitbart News that Barrack Obama—the current Democrat president—needs to be vetted. We know everything about Gov. Palin and Gov. Walker, but almost nothing about our current President.

Time to catch up on past due homework before moving on...