Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: entropy12
You maybe have a point there, but while a conservative candidate might not be elected this time, he never loses the battle for hearts and minds of people who yearn for liberty, laws, and prosperity.

Cruz is a solidly Tea Party conservative. Walker is not. He's a Blue Dog Republican, whose allegiance is with the GOPe corruptocrat machine and the Chamber of Amnesty.

I choose only to vote for a Tea Party conservative. My guy loses, I still win on messaging, on principle. And next time, my guy will probably win. In fact, many conservatives beat Blue Dog Republicans in 2010 and 2014. I won't let you forget that.

17 posted on 03/19/2015 11:59:46 AM PDT by WIBamian (Cruz for President. Alabama Senator Jeff Sessions for Vice-President. True conservative heroes!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: WIBamian

I understand your thinking. However after 8 years of degradation of country by the community organizer, it is imperative we do not nominate someone who is more likely to lose to Hillary.

On pure agenda basis, I agree with you Cruz is more pure than Walker. What I am looking at is that Walker won 3 times in a bluish state. That shows me he can win nationally.


20 posted on 03/19/2015 4:38:56 PM PDT by entropy12 (Real function of economists is to make astrologers look respectable.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson