Posted on 03/18/2015 9:44:18 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
Republican lawmakers have unveiled their 2016 budget proposal, which looks eliminate the budget deficit in the next decade and that means spending cuts. One place, in particular, the GOP is looking to cut: federal defense spending on global warming research.
Republicans have proposed cutting global warming research programs at the Defense Department and the CIA.
“The Department of Defense and the Central Intelligence Agency, two of the most important agencies in our national security apparatus, currently spend part of their budget studying climate change,” the GOP’s budget notes in a section detailing ways to “eliminate redundancies and end the abuse or misuse of taxpayer dollars.”
Republicans have long been critical of Pentagon efforts to “go green” and reduce their reliance on fossil fuels — remember the Navy’s costly “Green Fleet”? More recently, the GOP has criticized President Barack Obama for saying that global warming was as a bigger national security threat than terrorism.
In 2013, the White House reported that 18 federal agencies funded global warming programs, including scientific research, international climate assistance, incentivizing renewable energy technology and subsidies to renewable energy producers. In total, the government spent $22.2 billion fighting global warming.
Republican plans to cut global warming research funding also comes after Democratic lawmakers launched an investigation of scientists skeptical of global warming. Lawmakers also launched an investigation into companies and organizations they believed to be paying scientists for research critical of the so-called “climate consensus.”
The scientific community, however, fought back, calling the investigation launched by Arizona Rep. Raul Grijalva and other lawmakers a “witch hunt” meant to intimidate scientists who had differing views than the Obama administration.
“Publicly singling out specific researchers based on perspectives they have expressed and implying a failure to appropriately disclose funding sources — and thereby questioning their scientific integrity — sends a chilling message to all academic researchers,” the American Meteorological Society wrote to Grijalva.
“Mr. Grijalva’s letters convey an unstated but perfectly clear threat: Research disputing alarm over the climate should cease lest universities that employ such individuals incur massive inconvenience and expense—and scientists holding such views should not offer testimony to Congress,” Richard Lindzen, a climate scientist at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, wrote in the Wall Street Journal.
House Republicans are proposing to cut $5.5 trillion in government spending over the next decade and eliminate yearly federal budget deficits. The budget proposal claims to cut redundant federal programs, streamline the regulatory process, simplify the tax code, and repeal Obamacare.
Republicans are also stressing their budget eliminates the budget deficit without raising taxes.
“Today, our nation faces tremendous fiscal and economic challenges and, if nothing is done, a future of less opportunity and low expectations,” House Budget Committee Chairman Rep. Tom Price of Georgia said in a statement.
“In this budget, we have embraced the innovative spirit of the American people by putting forth policies that can deliver real results and that empower individuals, families, job creators and our communities to build a stronger more secure future,” Price said.
The GOP budget would make budget cuts while increasing defense spending from current levels and reforming entitlement programs to make them fiscally sustainable in the coming decades.
But Democrats have derided the budget, saying it cuts funding to crucial programs that Americans rely on while giving tax breaks to the rich.
“Our budgets are nothing less than a statement of our values,” House Minority Leader Rep. Nancy Pelosi of California said in a statement. “Republicans’ values are clear: big tax breaks for the ultra-wealthy and no concern for the challenges faced by hardworking Americans.”
Good luck!
Even a blind hog finds and acorn every now and then. I'll save my praise for when they actually do it (ha ha)
“Global Warming Research” is a euphemism for
imposing Carbon Taxes for the DNC-held and FannieMae-held
patents on such tax imposition
(proceeds to be split between the DNC and the Moslem
Brotherhood) WHILE ignoring any real Defense of the USA.
Anyone care to explain a rational basis for global warming research in the defense budget to begin with? Are we going to defeat global warming by shooting missiles at it?
It’s right after the part that says the purpose of NASA is Muslim outreach.
Well I could understand “Muslim outreach” in NASA’s budget. As long as it meant reaching out by shooting missiles at them.
The US can even identify the problem. They are putting in money to aspiring political no-show jobs which do nothing. There are no studies. There is no research. It is a giant slush fund. Cancel every dime of it in every Department that exists. I believe you are on point. What would DOD do if they actually prove there is a problem/
They need to stop all the black projects that are trying to cool a planet near the end of the inter glacial. Those programs amount to a war on the planet and it’s species.
One of the primary reasons that the warmists want this “research” tacked into the defense budget is because they feel it will give the predefined results more credibility. By saying that the US Military is planning for global warming it adds credibility, despite it being just the same old nonsense.
Perfect!
While they’re at it, they can CUT all those BS programs and freebies the ‘underserved’ traditionally enjoyed, BEFORE they got Obamacare!! :)
Or, re they supposed to CONTINUE to enjoy all those FORMER benefits and freebies AND Obamacare TOO? .... you know, having your cake and eating it TOO!!! ???
I mean HOW many times do the US taxpayers have to pay for THE SAME THING!?
They have to do more than just LOOK!!!!
Another entrant in the proofreading hall of fame. Couldn't get all the way through the first line without a careless error. Doesn't say much for his attention to detail.
The GOP eunuchs will first have to find their gonads.
They have numerous black projects that are attempting to cool the planet. How else could we break the world record for snowfall in a 24 hour period this year. The record was shattered actually. Unheard of snowfall rates in Italy. Our government and the Euroweenie goverments are killing this planet in more ways then can be counted. All due to stupidity and corruption. Not to say that other governments have not been innocent either.
Oops..have been innocent either.
Nothing to do with “global warming” has ANY place in a dammed defense or CIA budget!!! WTH!?!?
Insane!
Doubtlessly spent on boondoggles to enrich contributors and by extension their own campaign coffers which makes it money laundering. Just a way for them to get money from the Treasury by proxy.
“the GOP is looking to cut: federal defense spending on global warming research.”
About time someone said this GW was total BS!!!
My admittedly more cynical reason is that it keeps the overall defense budget at high levels, while diminishing under the covers, funds available for weapons, ammo, operations, boats/planes/vehicles... ie, anything actually related to defense.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.