[amihow]

Too many freepers sound superficial talking about looks. Camilla was an immoral adulteress. Looks nothing to do with why we should disapprove of her.

[fatnotlazy]

I don't care about looks either. Goodness knows I'm no raving beauty. More important I think is the content of one’s character. And there are a number of people who are beautiful, not according to People Magazine standards, but they have a beauty that emanates from the inside. Of course, there are also those whose ugliness oozes out of their pores. The Obamas are a prime example.

The royals are not good looking physically, but that's not their fault. If you look at old photos or artist renderings of past kings and queens, they were not good looking people. And because of the tendency to marry within a specific circle (at one time they used to marry family members), there was little opportunity to add any beauty genes to the mix. Mercifully, it looks like that practice has changed. Diana was pretty. Her sons are reasonably good looking, and the older one’s wife is nice looking. Hopefully, we won't hear too many complaints about looks soon.