Posted on 03/16/2015 8:28:38 PM PDT by gwgn02
Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker made another massive misstep on Monday, hiring Liz Mair of Mair Strategies to handle communications and social media for his campaign-in-waiting.
Mairs support for amnesty for illegal aliens, wide-open-borders immigration policies, and public advocacy for the Senate Gang of Eight amnesty bill is sure to dog Walker in Iowa, South Carolina, and other early presidential states.
During the Senate Gang of Eight bill fight, Mair very publicly and very aggressively promoted the amnesty billpushing it to media and making the case for the need for it over and over again. She claims her advocacy was done out of the good of her heart, for free, because for religious reasons she believes in amnesty and open borders. But Mair wouldnt answer who was paying her bills for her advocacy during the timeframe of the Gang of Eight bill in early 2013 through the end of the last Congresswhen asked by Breitbart News if any specific tech companies or a select group of Wall Street billionaires were paying her.
Were contractually barred from disclosing our clients, Mair said.
That could mean anyoneeven foreign companies potentiallywere paying her during the timeframe she was publicly advocating for the amnesty bill. While she didnt have to disclose it to the public at the time now that shes hitched to Walker the Wisconsin governor owns everything she said and did.
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
pot. kettle. hypocritical.
I wonder if her amnesty promoting employers are connected to Scott's campaign, and that is how he hired her.
If Walker becomes President, would you support him hiring a Muslim Spokesperson, who had very questionable ties and or views regarding terrorism?
I noted you completely evaded the questions, and attempted to make me the issue.
Geeze. Perhaps Walker is pro Amnesty.
Honestly, the entire country, FR included, are like crush-silly teens, expecting their beloved to act the way they dream they will act.
Walker is pro amnesty. Duh.
Just the slightest google ‘research’ reveals this. Ask why he went against the unions.
Motivation is everything in such matters. It shows a projection. Where is he going with it.
‘Hes bounced back and forth on this issue. And I dont like that.’
Here’s where any fifteen year old girl advises her BFF: then break up with him
It only gets worse. He doesn’t change, sweetie
It wasn’t a question. It was a grenade wrapped in a retarded hypothetical situation that was masquerading as a question. no serious person would have dignified your “question” with an answer.
“Why hire a loser “
That’s what bothers me.
A professional can be hired without regard to their past clients. But she’s a loser: Fiorina and Perry.
He should hire an “online communicator” who knows how to win.
It wasnt a question. It was a grenade wrapped in a retarded hypothetical situation
See the ? above? It mean a question. A very basic legitimate and credible question, which you have repeatedly evaded.
Did I hire that staffer or did he? Did I make Breitbart write about it?
pot. kettle. hypocritical.
**************************************************************
It’s not hypocritical to suggest that someone being paranoid needs to lighten up -—particularly when he writes that he is inferring a conspiracy (apparently to attack Scott Walker). If you knew of the posters here you would know that most like Scott Walker and desperately want him to avoid slashing his own political throat by actions such as this. People become known by the associations they make...if you lie down with dogs, you’ll get fleas. Scott Walker does not need to self-destruct, but he may be in the process of doing so-—unfortunately.
Walker is 100% GOPe.
the question was a howler. the odd part is that you seem to be so proud of it, which I find . . . Perplexing.
your feigned offense isn’t working. if there is an anti-Walker thread anywhere in al gore’s innerwebz, you are going to post it here.
Walker’s been advocating amnesty and virtual open borders for years. Even if he fires her it will only be to try to hide and mislead on his real pro-amnesty/open borders position.
Amnesty is the reason Scott Walker must not be the GOP nominee.
Is gonna “evolve” after the election?
Exactly.
That’s what I was wondering.
Walker must be doing something RIGHT, if you get my drift.
So far you've called the question a "grenade" question, a "retarded" question and now a "howler" question.
It just a legitimate question.
Not answering the question is quite revealing and very inquisitive from my perspective.
Why all the evasion?
What, now you’re gonna badger a good Freeper who posts lots of good threads here—because you don’t want other Freepers to read the truth about Walker?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.