Posted on 03/13/2015 2:49:29 PM PDT by lbryce
We surmised yesterday that the Obama administration had the idea to go to the United Nations to pass by resolution what Congress would never agree to: a lifting of sanctions on Iran in exchange for a nearly worthless deal in which Iran would keep thousands of centrifuges and get a 10-year glide path to nuclear breakout. Sen. Bob Corker (R-Tenn.), seeing what was afoot, demanded an explanation from the White House, calling such a scheme an affront to the American people.
On Thursday evening, after being pressed by irate Republicans, the National Security Council issued a defensive statement insisting that it would do no such thing. The story was handed to BuzzFeed:
The U.S. has no intention of using the United Nations to lock into place any potential deal with Iran over its nuclear program, a senior U.S. official said on Thursday.
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...
Which is why I ask once again: WHERE IS PUTIN?
Doing his own deal with the mullahs.
I think that the agreement was made on February 23rd, when all of the new pukes were in Munich—ironic because that is where Chamberlain commited the League of nations to the Munich Agreement that caused WWII.
Ping for later
Another note—Chamberlain, Daladier (France), and Mussolini signed the Munich Agreement on Sept. 29, 1938. Germany invaded Poland one year later. Kerry met Zarif (Iran) on Feb. 6th, 2015 with Helga Scmid (EU) present. Rumor has it that a deal was concluded on February 23rd, 2015 that included France and Russia. All the rest is smoke and mirrors for US voters benefit. Needless to say, if the breakdown of the 2015 Munich Agreement occurs on the same schedule as 1938, War will occur before a new President is able to change anything. Thus, we will have lost our soverienty.
"During his first presidential campaign in 2008, Mr. Obama used a secret back channel to Tehran to assure the mullahs that he was a friend of the Islamic Republic, and that they would be very happy with his policies. The secret channel was Ambassador William G. Miller, who served in Iran during the shahs rule, as chief of staff for the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, and as ambassador to Ukraine."
Scheme is one of the nicer words to use
Jennifer Rubin is not a “conservative blogger” by any stretch of the imagination.
This is about Hillary vs. Obama; emails vs. Iran sellout.
This is also about Benghazi, the real story behind it.
Jennifer Rubin is a Hillary fan.
Doing his own deal with the mullahs.
Hey, it’s as good a guess as anything else.
I like Tom Cotton's method better.
Obama and John Kerry have finally figured out a way to prevent Iran from cheating on it's nuclear arms treaty
Welcome to the wonderful world of Obama foreign policy, a world where Obama cuts deals so bad for the United States and so sweet for Iran that Iran would never be even remotely tempted to to cheat on the treaty.
In fact, Obama has given away so much, even an outright, all out Iranian nuclear arms race would violate Obama’s proposed treaty.
Obama hopes that sometime during the rest of his elected term, Iran can achieve a working nuclear weapon, use it on both Tel Aviv and the Vatican, thereby forcing him to remain in office due to the world wide emergency ... Unfortunately, Iran has a different idea - their third weapon will detonate in NYC ...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.