Posted on 03/13/2015 5:43:02 AM PDT by RoosterRedux
If Walker remains the most likely conservative to win the Republican nomination, then other conservative contenders will find their support and contributions going to Walker. As the race begins to boil down to Walker or Bush, conservatives will have an increasingly simple choice.
The only thing that might derail Scott Walker is if he seems to be unelectable. Yet Scott Walker is the only governor in American history to have ever won three elections in four years, and that in Wisconsin. The most recent Marist poll shows Scott Walker running neck and neck with Hillary Clinton, and it shows Scott Walker running better against Hillary than any other Republican. That suggests that not only is Walker electable, but he may well be the most electable Republican around.
Conservatives, frustrated since 1988, want a strong conservative to be the Republican nominee in 2016, and Scott Walker fits that perfectly. Republicans, practically all Republicans, want to win the White House next time around, and Scott Walker may be the best chance for a Republican president in 2016. It is hard to see moderates fighting Walker too hard, and it is almost certain that conservatives will coalesce around him fairly fast. Scott Walker seems unstoppable.
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
Bwahahahahaha....
There is no such thing as “unstoppable”. Remember, this same chattering class thought the 2008 election was going to be a nail-biter between Hillary and Rudy. How’d that turn out, again?
However, Walker might not be the ideal conservative candidate (flip-floppiness on amnesty and ethanol are.... worrisome, to say the least), but I’d say he really ought to be considered the early favorite. He’s clearly a winner - something the GOP desperately needs - and he’s shown a determination to get key policies implemented in the face of heavy opposition and media pressure - something conservatives should be licking their chops over.
But invincible? No, not even close. Heck, the establishment wing is still trying to find a viable alternative (settling on Rubio?) and he’ll face pressure from the right. And there’s always a chance for a major unforced error, especially with a hostile media ready to turn any little thing, real or imagined, into a major scandal.
Rubio is not firmly in the establishment camp nor the base camp IMO. He’s got his amnesty problem of course - and others, but he’s far better than most estabs on most issues.
And let’s not forget this: if he hadn’t shown what is possible with his total defeat of Charlie Crist - unknowns like Mike Lee and Ted Cruz might not have even run two years later. I’m no Rubio guy, and he ticked me off with his Guiliani comments recently, but he’s not McCain or Graham or McConnell.
Makes me think of the title of a book that a friend wrote ... WTF
Good catch, you are right now as I recall. So there were even more lead changes than I remembered. (this is the problem of posting before both cups of coffee have taken effect...:)
I am.
Here's my list.
Freakin unelectable:
Jeb Bush
Mitt Romney
Chris Christie
John McCain
Rick Santorum
Donald Trump
Linda Graham
Lamar Alexander
I'd hold my nose and vote for:
Newt Gingrich
Marco Rubio
Rick Perry
Bobby Jindal
I'd enthusiastically vote for:
Sarah Palin
Scott Walker
Ted Cruz
HAH, indeed. That book does chronicle all the ups and downs just from late winter of 2011(which would be 8-9 months from now) through Florida. And there were tons.
Your list is better than mine!
That's one of the reasons I like Walker so much. Our candidates face a massively uphill battle against the biased press. But in Walker's case, the press and left-wing have desperately tried to destroy for him for years with no luck. He's been through their absolute worst with them digging through every atom of his past and present and they can't even find enough to blow smoke other than "he never finished college" and "he doesn't care about global warming" and "he hurts unions".
Once they can find a comedian who can effectively impersonate him on Saturday Night Live, he’s toast.
You have a good list
I agree with your list. You have properly placed Trump and Santorum as unelectable, and excluded Paul and Carson completely. Much better.
Scott Walker has not yet met the Bush $$mear machine yet. If he can maintain his bearing and humor when that gets cranked up then I think he is in for the duration.
Ha! Cruz? Too polarizing?
Their heroine Hillary is the most polarizing candidate I’ve ever seen in my life.
The RNC votes for him. The Chamber of Commerce votes for him. That is just shy of the Majority needed to win the primaries. It is more than enough if the Conservatives are not weeded down to one by the second set of primaries.
Though I’m a bit more aligned with Cruz’ thinking, Walker has a proven record of not only reaching a broader spectrum of voters with a conservative agenda, he has a proven record of kicking democrats’ asses in a state that hasn’t voted R since 1988.
I think you need our candidates out there to beat up on Hillary. Carla Fiorina is perfect attack dog for that, as is Ben Carson. I see no reason for us to coalesce around anyone until Hillary or someone commits.
Cruze and Walker are probably the only ones who can go the whole primary season without apologizing for something or explaining something. Either slip dooms a Republican. That’s why Democrats never apologize, even when they are “apologizing” for something.
Exactly... and do you also get the sense Walker thrives on fighting an uphill battle? And as for "he never finished college" and "he doesn't care about global warming" and "he hurts unions" ... I think there's a deep strain of American voters who embrace those as positive qualities.
I could see Carly Fiorina as a strong VP choice.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.