Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Darksheare

I’ve often said to the wife that if they ever become serious about going after the 401K, I’d figure out how get it all now and pay one penalty, than for them to continuously raid it over time, or “nationalize” it.


10 posted on 03/12/2015 12:07:46 PM PDT by kosciusko51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: kosciusko51; 05 Mustang GT Rocks

Next up: Obama01k, you pay into it..
...and some non-citizen gets to enjoy it.


15 posted on 03/12/2015 12:11:04 PM PDT by Darksheare (Those who support liberal "Republicans" summarily support every action by same.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: kosciusko51

That penalty is 33 1/2 percent of the balance. Ouch.

But hey, something is better than nothing.


16 posted on 03/12/2015 12:11:41 PM PDT by Obadiah (Wind turbines, aka: bird choppers, cause earthquakes due to their harmonic frequencies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: kosciusko51

If they try to take my 401K, there will be blood.


19 posted on 03/12/2015 12:15:41 PM PDT by Uncle Miltie (Bush / Clinton 2016! Clinton / Bush 2020! Uniparty Forever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: kosciusko51

“I’ve often said to the wife that if they ever become serious about going after the 401K, I’d figure out how get it all now and pay one penalty, than for them to continuously raid it over time, or “nationalize” it.”

You can buy rental property with the funds. The rent goes back into your 401k. It is unlikely they’ll take rental property as the liability is too high.


28 posted on 03/12/2015 12:35:59 PM PDT by Gen.Blather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: kosciusko51

I’m already there and have already done that.


37 posted on 03/12/2015 1:35:40 PM PDT by taxcontrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: kosciusko51

I’ve heard comments that the government would be fine with that, because you’re paying all these taxes on the withdrawal.

However, since the federal government is severely beholden to financial institutions, they aren’t going to nationalize several trillions in retirements accounts.
Instead, I think you’ll see mandates that for an account to be tax advantaged, several percent have to be invested in federal bonds to make up for market volatility.
The state then gets a chunk of that pie immediately, and it can ratchet up the mandatory percentage over time. And by having continued growth on the invested portion, there’s more money to draw upon over time.


38 posted on 03/12/2015 1:38:50 PM PDT by tbw2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: kosciusko51
I’ve often said to the wife that if they ever become serious about going after the 401K, I’d figure out how get it all now and pay one penalty, than for them to continuously raid it over time, or “nationalize” it.

Same here. I'd pay a 50% penalty, because I know that I would be getting less than 50 cents on the dollar back after our inept government starts administering it, and making income adjusted annunites.

51 posted on 03/13/2015 4:07:47 AM PDT by catfish1957 (Everything I needed to know about Islam was written on 11 Sep 2001)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson