I’ve said all along that ammunition was the Achilles heel of the 2nd Amendment. Guns without ammo are clubs.
(/s)
Oh gee, yet another “warning”. Talk is cheap. When are they going to do something?
Since when does the Second Amendment only protect a right to bear unloaded arms?
This is getting absurd.
The government is our enemy. PERIOD.
Welcome to the party Senators, but you’re a little off.
And late.
It isn’t just at risk, it is under full assault and YOU idiots will do NOTHING!
“52 senators warn of sweeping ammo bans”
Jesus, I read that as: 52 senators WARM TO sweeping ammo bans.
Better make this my last cup of coffee for a few hours.
Barack Obama Respons To The Senators Concncerns
Talk is cheap, you complicit GOP.
legislative v executive
CONgre$$ might as well resign and go home. King Hussein, CEObama, and his collectives are the new rulers…
Witness the amassing of executive power via the agencies/cabinets. Witness the history of the republic.
Executive apparatchiks are dictating to/laughing at/working in conjunction with CONgre$$.
He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harrass our people, and eat out their substance.
http://www.usa.gov/directory/federal/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cabinet_of_the_United_States
CONgre$$ - Check$ and Balance$
7. It must not be forgotten that the members of the legislative body are to have a deep stake in the game. This is an essential point, and happily is attended with no difficulty. A sufficient number, properly disposed, can alternately legislate and speculate, and speculate and legislate, and buy and sell, and sell and buy, until a due portion of the property of their constituents has passed into their hands to give them an interest against their constituents, and to ensure the part they are to act.
8. The ways in which a great debt, so constituted and applied, will contribute to the ultimate end in view are both numerous and obvious. (1) The favorite few, thus possessed of it, whether within or without the government, will feel the staunchest fealty to it, and will go through thick and thin to support it in all its oppressions and usurpations. (2) Their money will give them consequence and influence, even among those who have been tricked out of it. (3) They will be the readiest materials that can be found for a hereditary aristocratic order, whenever matters are ripe for one. (4) A great debt will require great taxes; great taxes, many taxgatherers and other officers; and all officers are auxiliaries of power.
11. As soon as sufficient progress in the intended change shall have been made, and the public mind duly prepared according to the rules already laid down, it will be proper to venture on another and a bolder step toward a removal of the constitutional landmarks.
http://www.constitution.org/cmt/freneau/republic2monarchy.htm
We have ZERO representation.
Letters are not going to correct the situation. Either the Congress mans up and shuts off ATF funding or the states need to start announcing that they will ignore the ban.
Now you know why the government bought all that ammo.
Obama likes the way Hitler and Marx operated.
So does an ice pick.
Would those 52 senators, 238 House members advocate shooting those who would enforce that law/regulation?
No?
Piss down my back and tell me it's raining...
5.56mm
Only 2 Senate Republicans did not sign the Letter.
Grassley in IA and Kirk in IL. Even the RINO GOP Senators signed this letter.
Now the question, which ComDem Senators would vote to defend the 2nd Amendment? Somewhat fateful question for our nation.
My mistake, took data from article. Looks like Grassley (leading group) did vote for it.
I pulled my list from the text of the article.
But Kirk in IL was not listed.
Whew, they DID send a letter. I was worried. /s
The headlines makes it sound like these Senators amd House members are outside looking in. Don't they CREATE the laws?
