On a side note, a skilled prosecutor is all about timing.
They know when a witness will make the most impact on jury.
In this case, I am thinking of 2 points.
1. The sub-committee & chair Gowdy may have been more concerned about contents of Benghazi emails rather than which email server it was sent from.
2. If indeed incriminating evidence exists, bringing it out 20 months before election is tantamount to premature ejaculation. Voters are notorious for short memories.
Are you interested in finding the truth about Bengazi or using the deaths of four Americans
as a “Campaign Tool” for 2016.
It seems you are more interested in the latter, than the truth.
Which explains you and others support for Gowdy.
BTW, who is going to enforce the email supeona Gowdy issued?
In fact, issued on the same day the story leaked about Clintons emails?
Even though Gowdy has known about these emails for 6 months.