Posted on 03/06/2015 8:01:44 PM PST by dontreadthis
The Native American National Council will offer amnesty to the estimated 240 million illegal white immigrants living in the United States. At a meeting on Friday in Taos, New Mexico, Native American leaders weighed a handful of proposals about the future of the United State’s large, illegal European population. After a long debate, NANC decided to extend a road to citizenship for those without criminal records or contagious diseases.
“We will give Europeans the option to apply for Native Citizenship,” explained Chief Sauti of the Nez Perce tribe. “To obtain legal status, each applicant must write a heartfelt apology for their ancestors’ crimes, pay an application fee of $5,000, and, if currently on any ancestral Native land, they must relinquish that land to NANC or pay the market price, which we decide.
“Any illegal European who has a criminal record of any sort, minus traffic and parking tickets, will be deported back to their native land. Anybody with contagious diseases like HIV, smallpox, herpes, etc, will not qualify and will also be deported.”
European colonization of North America began in the 16th and 17th centuries, when arrivals from France, Spain and England first established settlements on land that had been occupied by native peoples. Explorers Lewis & Clark further opened up western lands to settlement, which ultimately led to the creation of the Indian reservation system.
Despite the large number of Europeans residing in the United States, historical scholars mostly agree that indigenous lands were taken illegally through war, genocide and forced displacement.
Despite the council’s decision, a native group called True Americans lambasted the move, claiming amnesty will only serve to reward lawbreakers.
“They all need to be deported back to Europe,” John Dakota from True Americans said. “They came here illegally and took a giant crap on our land. They brought disease and alcoholism, stole everything we have because they were too lazy to improve and develop their own countries.”
You are correct except until tribals were allowed to leave the reservations that were provided, they were almost like an interrment camp...
I don’t have a clue as to what the “chief” would do if his actions actually came true...Probably he would be so totally lost surprise and confusion he wouldn’t know which way was up....*LOL*
I was only interested in why you think it would be interesting to know the DNA of posters in regards to their opinions on immigration, or more specifically in this thread, a stupid article that is confused about immigration.
Note to the Tribe: don’t bring a tomahawk to a gunfight...
In my opinion, it would be funny for the posters to be making snide remarks about people that they may be unknowingly a part of...Does that clarify my curiosity to you now?
That’s patently ridiculous !
Not ALL Indians were put on reservations!
You are bereft of a massive amount of factual history, and have a chip the size of several redwoods, on your shoulder.
I haven’t a drop of Indian blood.
Make of that what you will.
Absolutely spot on! The difference between us and the
so-called Native Americans is that our hostile takeover
was recent enough in human history to be documented for
the ages. Using their logic not one foot of human
occupied land anywhere in the whole world is currently in
the hands of its’ rightful owners! If they want it they
can try to take it.
I don’t recall ever saying ALL tribals were placed om reservations...What I did say was accurate...
So, I’m not a citizen, good, I don’t have an individual health care mandate..
Let me in on the monthly casino stipend and I’ll happily immigrate.
One look at their reservations tells the truth.
My ancestors bought land fair and square from the natives back in the 1620s. Little place that is now called “Manhattan”
True...If archeaologists are accurate, they beginning of humanoids was on the land we now call Africa..
That's the point I got. If you fail to organize and fight the invaders when they are few, then you will eventually face a more populous enemy and may well lose everything you have to them.
Works for me.
One of my favorite quotes by Winston Churchill:
“If you will not fight for right when you can easily win without blood shed;
if you will not fight when your victory is sure and not too costly;
you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance of survival. There may even be a worse case.
You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves.”
You think that this is a race discussion and that people’s views on accurate history would change, if they find out they have some particular DNA?
Are you left winger, or black militant, or a member of some racist Indian group or KKK or something?
I was thinking the same thing. A great something grandfather came to Indiana from Germany in the mid 1700’s. He fought for The British in the French and Indian war and served under George Washington in the Revolutionary war. Like many settlers of the area he took a native bride and had many children. Rinse and repeat for a couple more generations and a couple two or three wars.
What you posted was just ambiguous enough to make it include ALL INDIANS.
You posted it; you are responsible for what it says....which wasn’t accurate.
I don’t know how it is in the west, but in the south there has been intermarriages between the people for so long that many would be surprised what their bloodlines could show way down the line...
I am Scots/Irish and Ani-Yun-Wiya that I know of, but there is probably British, Dutch, German, and African blood in there also...
If you only still had the title, eh?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.