Experience with Foreign Policy - that is why a President has a Secretary of State! I’m not trying to be flippant here, but the next President will have to concentrate on issues at home and bring the troops home from overseas.
We’re bankrupting ourselves by playing global policeman.
J. Bolton has run for president, but I think he is not best qualified for that position. Any better suggestions for Sec. of State?
Being in the intel community...we have to have people on the ground in certain areas...Not Iraq or Afghanistan...but close enough to run human intelligence and gather necessary info to be successful on identifying threats...and having the elected leadership that will recognize those threats for what they are...there is a relationship of several layers and multiple entities that has to be maintained — or we become blind. That in itself is not good - especially with the cyber front and more technical weapons that present today than ever before...IMO...but this Reconstruction waste of time crap - Yes, I agree with you...it was a waste of lives and material that we spend in Iraq and Afghan...they din’t want it - and we shouldn’t have provided it.
maybe he should run as the Demonic Party's candidate, then he would be fine; the e-Repukelicans wouldn't lift a finger to fight him.
My first thought was that, of course, he’s in trouble with the DC elite. They wouldn’t be caught dead in a Kohls. WAYYYY beneath them to do anything that makes sense. :)
Entitlements.