I note that the end of his piece is a call for censorship that jails people who speak in ways he disapproves of. Perhaps missing the point of the first amendment that protects the paper he works for?
Sad excuse.
RE: I note that the end of his piece is a call for censorship that jails people who speak in ways he disapproves of.
_________________________________
This is how Capehart ends his column at the WaPo:
“DSouza should be in jail where he would no longer be able to assault the rest of us with his special brand of racist bile.”
This tells me a lot about how he views the First Amendment and tells me that he has more in common with Fidel and Raul Castro than the founding fathers.