Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The powers behind the FCC’s muscling of the Internet
NRO ^ | John Fund

Posted on 02/27/2015 7:51:19 AM PST by RoosterRedux

oday’s vote by a bitterly divided Federal Communications Commission that the Internet should be regulated as a public utility is the culmination of a decade-long battle by the Left. Using money from George Soros and liberal foundations that totaled at least $196 million, radical activists finally succeeded in ramming through “net neutrality,” or the idea that all data should be transmitted equally over the Internet. The final push involved unprecedented political pressure exerted by the Obama White House on FCC chairman Tom Wheeler, head of an ostensibly independent regulatory body.

“Net neutrality’s goal is to empower the federal government to ration and apportion Internet bandwidth as it sees fit, and to thereby control the Internet’s content,” says Phil Kerpen, an anti-net-neutrality activist from the group American Commitment.

The courts have previously ruled the FCC’s efforts to impose “net neutrality” out of bounds, so the battle isn’t over. But for now, the FCC has granted itself enormous power to micromanage the largely unrestrained Internet.

(Excerpt) Read more at nationalreview.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: fcc; netneutrality
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last

1 posted on 02/27/2015 7:51:19 AM PST by RoosterRedux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux

Why can’t I declare that I am the czar of the internet, or the highways, or grocery stores, or microchip factories, and start issuing edicts and laws?

Can local and regional and national internet service providers simply say FU to the FCC? How many divisions does the FCC have?


2 posted on 02/27/2015 7:55:19 AM PST by mbarker12474
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux

See you in fed court(s) FCC.


3 posted on 02/27/2015 7:55:23 AM PST by Biggirl (2014 MIdterms Were BOTH A Giant Wave And Restraining Order)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux

Three people, how can three people just say they’re in charge of the entire world wide web? Doesn’t seem possible.


4 posted on 02/27/2015 8:06:25 AM PST by Kenny (,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mbarker12474

These carriers bow to the FCC and this relationship goes back years. I have seen this up close. They will file lawsuits but ultimately submit for further punishment and abuse.


5 posted on 02/27/2015 8:07:00 AM PST by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux

More affirmative action ignoramuses hired by Los Federales to regulate things to sheeeeeeet. Bureaucratic empire building at its finest. More tax money stolen from the peasants in the provinces to pay high salaried Federal trough feeders in the greater DC region which already is the wealthiest slice of America.

Creating more Federal jobs, over regulation and overreach is what is going on more than just “net neutrality”. The prime mover here is ever more Federal interference in private sector matters that do fine just by themselves


6 posted on 02/27/2015 8:13:06 AM PST by dennisw (The first principle is to find out who you are then you can achieve anything -- Buddhist monk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux

Obama’s Organizing for Action will receive a Huge Contract to help Neutralize all enemies of Obama


7 posted on 02/27/2015 8:15:40 AM PST by molson209 (Blank)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dennisw
More affirmative action ignoramuses hired by Los Federales to regulate things to sheeeeeeet.

What.... you tired of being governed by the left side of the bell curve? You need to refill your white guilt tank.

8 posted on 02/27/2015 8:18:17 AM PST by Random Access
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux
But for now, the FCC has granted itself enormous power to micromanage the largely unrestrained Internet.

Federal agencies cannot grant themselves powers. There HAS to be other entities involved.

9 posted on 02/27/2015 8:24:22 AM PST by WayneS (Barack Obama makes Neville Chamberlin look like George Patton.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux
"Why can’t I declare that I am the czar of the internet, or the highways, or grocery stores, or microchip factories, and start issuing edicts and laws?"

I like your thinking.

And as such I call dibs on being Czar of salons that offer full Brazilian wax jobs for bikini models.

10 posted on 02/27/2015 8:24:47 AM PST by Mad Dawgg (If you're going to deny my 1st Amendment rights then I must proceed to the 2nd one...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux

“Net neutrality” is “net control”

It is Operation Chock Point applied to the First Amendment.


11 posted on 02/27/2015 8:25:08 AM PST by Ray76 (Obama says, "Unlike my mum, Ruth has all the documents needed to prove who Mark's father was.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux
THE problem with the new rules is that does it give an opening for a US government agency to determine what can be posted online? If it does, that right there is government censorship in peacetime, expressly prohibited by First Amendment free speech rights.
12 posted on 02/27/2015 8:51:46 AM PST by RayChuang88 (FairTax: America's economic cure)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

You Know You'll Donate Sooner Or Later
Why Not Do It Sooner And End The 'thon?


Click The Pic To Donate

Support FR, Donate Monthly If You Can

13 posted on 02/27/2015 8:52:54 AM PST by DJ MacWoW (The Fed Gov is not one ring to rule them all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mbarker12474
Someone is going to have to explain this to me. I've read

"The goal is to prevent providers from slowing or blocking web traffic, or creating paid fast lanes on the Internet, said FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler."

Why is this a bad thing?

14 posted on 02/27/2015 8:55:27 AM PST by jpsb (Believe nothing until it has been officially denied)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux

Will we be required to listen to Obama speeches and government pronouncements as part of the price of using the internet?
Pop-ups like “If you love your family, and your government, you’ll buy only government certified organic Hemp seed oil”


15 posted on 02/27/2015 9:13:13 AM PST by Leep (Obama Care has hit the fan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux

If the cable companies can’t charge for upgrades they will have to spread the cost. That means the “little guys’” costs will go up. The big cable companies are not going to cut their profits. They own way too many politicians. And their complaining is BS/


16 posted on 02/27/2015 9:15:51 AM PST by VerySadAmerican (Obama voters are my enemy. And so are RINO voters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jpsb

With government programs, when does the stated goal ever turn out to be the actual goal?


17 posted on 02/27/2015 9:17:23 AM PST by Bob (Violence in islam? That's not a bug; it's a feature.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Bob

Yeah, I also read that the new regs are 300 pages. You do not need 300 pages to simply ensure fair and equal access for all.


18 posted on 02/27/2015 9:20:14 AM PST by jpsb (Believe nothing until it has been officially denied)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: VerySadAmerican

A lot of folks are simply cancelling cable (I am next week) and watching TV via Roku and Youtube.


19 posted on 02/27/2015 9:39:33 AM PST by RoosterRedux (WSC: The truth is incontrovertible; malice may attack it, ignorance may deride it, but in the end...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Random Access

correct.... But even if these were legitimate hires via ability and civil service tests it is till wrong for Los Federales to be sticking their fingers in every private sector pie

Los Federales are engaged in a shakedown racket. Aggrieved parties are always contributing to Senators and CongressCritter in an effort to get The Feds off their backs. So congress kind of likes over regulation and Congressmen know how to make it benefit them, to keep themselves in office


20 posted on 02/27/2015 9:43:43 AM PST by dennisw (The first principle is to find out who you are then you can achieve anything -- Buddhist monk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson