Posted on 02/26/2015 2:08:09 PM PST by zeestephen
It appears as though internal variability has offset warming over the last 15 or so years...Eventually we expect temperatures to catch up, but it may take longer than five years for that to happen...
(Excerpt) Read more at msn.com ...
The other 96% came from natural events.
It appears as though internal variability has offset warming over the last 15 or so years...Eventually we expect temperatures to catch up, but it may take longer
More propaganda from the climate change crowd who must explain why their climate models are not working and why we have had close to two decades without any global warming. Pure BS,
That’s the ticket.
They never let being 100% wrong stop them from predicting dire consequences if we don’t all get rid of our cars and start living like third world peasants, cooking and heating with fires made from dried animal dung. Well, not ALL of us, just the people who don’t believe in globull warming.
The world doesn’t conform to our theory. Therefore the world is wrong.
I'll bet the Canadians would love to be a major exporter of fine wines again.
internal variability = Constipation
Science-deniers is what they are ...
Translation...
It is worse than we thought AND Women and Minorities to be most affected.
but most importantly ... We need a grant.
3.5% to be exact. But nature's 200 Gt per year gets reabsorbed in the spring and summer and man's 7Gt is all output. Therefore the increase in CO2 in atmosphere that is being observed is 100% manmade.
Another way to look at it, were the CO2 rise natural, it would amount to 5-10 ppm due to the warming after the Little Ice Age. Instead we have gone from 280 to 400 and rising. For that to be natural, there would have be a 10-12C ocean warming within the last few centuries or so. That's not at all plausible.
Today I was talking to another person that I know voted for Obama twice, they have all said the same thing. “ all politicians are evil, both sides are no good”. In other words I am not willing to say that my votes for Obama were stupid.
In other words, assuming our models are correct, it had to be natural variability. Therefore, our models are correct.
Oh, and of course, IT’S WORSE THAN WE THOUGHT!
That would be Michael Mann, inventor of the fraudulent Hockey Stick, wouldn’t it? Yeah. Thought so.
The lack of global warming is due to global warming.
LOL
...computer models...phttt...
There is not one that has been shown to be accurate.
Show me one that if you plug-in the data from the year 1900
that it will predict the year 2000 data.
It does not exist.
So, as the article states, they take the predictions
from over 100 computer models and average the results.
How does averaging 100 “wrong answers” yield a “right answer”?
Let me see now. If the Chicago Cubs fail to win the World Series for many, many years, that means they will win it almost every year in the near future to catch up......five years of accelerated WS-winning!
"What a hockey puck."
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.