Posted on 02/26/2015 6:46:30 AM PST by shove_it
Anything done by executive order can be changed by a future executive order. This is a regulatory action, not a federal law passed by Congress like Obamacare.
(Reuters) - U.S. regulators are poised to impose the toughest rules yet on Internet service providers, aiming to ensure fair treatment of all web traffic through their networks.
____________________________________________________________
What this says to me is: Comments against bambaboy, and the government will no longer be allowed; we won’t have a “Rush Limbaugh” web page; we won’t be able to go to the internet and read what “Fox News Network” has to say about what is happening in government; but you bet your last dollar that CNN; and all the other media outlets will be able to spread bambaboy’s garbage all over the internet!!!
This really isn’t such a big leap. Already, there is very little on TV, radio or the net that isn’t geared to push the Liberal agenda. I’m so sick of having it pushed down my throat I could scream! Then I look at my grandchildren’s textbooks and schoolwork and want to throw up! Net neutrality will just be a little mopping up scheme to make sure that sites like FR don’t mistreat the poor little Commie swisher trolls by banning them or saying unkind things about them that may damage their fragile psyches. In other words, insanity will rule and any remnant of free expression that may have survived in isolated pockets will be silenced. Welcome to Obama’s “transformed” America.
Sounds about right. How do you say "death to the EIB network" auf Deutsch?
Hard to tell what the impact of this is since the details are not out. So far, most discussion has been around billing for tiered bandwidth access, which by taking that away will slow down innovation as it takes the incentive away to develop improvements. The rest seems to be speculation....imho
Yup. The same FCC that allowed a Civil War telegraph tax to stay on phone bills since...well... the civil war!
Because, nothing is as it seems.
Your comment is right on the mark.
I tell my 28 year old daughter two things over and over these days :
1) you and your generation have given up so much of the freedom I had up until a short time ago - and seem OK with that, and
2) I am glad I am near the end of my life as I would not want to live 64 more years in her America.
The sound of crickets usually follows as she is too busy Facebooking to give a damn.
"The Stasi often used a method which was really diabolic. It was called Zersetzung, and it's described in another guideline. The word is difficult to translate because it means originally "biodegradation." But actually, it's a quite accurate description. The goal was to destroy secretly the self-confidence of people, for example by damaging their reputation, by organizing failures in their work, and by destroying their personal relationships. Considering this, East Germany was a very modern dictatorship. The Stasi didn't try to arrest every dissident. It preferred to paralyze them, and it could do so because it had access to so much personal information and to so many institutions. Hubertus Knabe, German Historian
But why did the Stasi collect all this information in its archives? The main purpose was to control the society. In nearly every speech, the Stasi minister gave the order to find out who is who, which meant who thinks what. He didn't want to wait until somebody tried to act against the regime. He wanted to know in advance what people were thinking and planning. The East Germans knew, of course, that they were surrounded by informers, in a totalitarian regime that created mistrust and a state of widespread fear, the most important tools to oppress people in any dictatorship.- Hubertus Knabe, German historian"
East Germany isn't a warning to American Progressives.
Its a Goal and an Instruction Manual.
I feel the same way. It also bothers me that rioters are allowed to run wild, like in Missouri, but no huge demonstration against illegal aliens who are invading this country. Instead, the government is providing them with special rewards simply because they have broken our laws. This is sick.
Spot on.
Where I live, in a semi-rural area with my house about 1400 feet from the nearest main road, we have no access to wired broadband.
The telco and cable company have told me, (albeit politely) to pound sand, I'm not getting a broadband connection as far into the future as they can see it.
So I'm stuck with satellite or wireless internet, with data caps that make anything other than web surfing or E-mail unavailable. Stream a movie? Yeah, maybe once a month, with a break for buffering every ninety seconds or so.
So when the broadband companies start whining about how they won't be able to "innovate", I find myself here:
Excellent post.
Bump that.
Liberals have been able to tie up regs don’t like for years in the court, why can’t it the same with this?
Comcast is the primary agent of DNC propaganda. What ever Comcast wants it is going to get.
To solve the problem, Comcast must be destroyed
“Comcast must be destroyed”
They are pretty much the best deal out there for an ISP so leave that part alone please...hehehe
Fox News panel last night....Rahm Emmanuel is in trouble in Chicago because his opponent is channeling Elizabeth Warren, and the low-infos are flocking to him like lemmings.
They are about to take over the Democrat Party.
And then the country.
In public approval polling Comcast consistently ranks somewhere between ISIS and Ebola. That is how Obama is getting away with this.
Because in the eyes of the Marxist third of America, it is not FAIR that some have the resources to pay for a better home, better car, better doctor, or faster internet. It is far better to make everything crappy for everyone, so that it will be FAIR.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.