Posted on 02/24/2015 5:24:18 PM PST by Kaslin
RUSH: "An Oregon Democrat believes that the fight for amnesty for illegal immigrants is the 'civil rights battle' for Millennials that will decide who controls the country for the next three decades. 'Immigration reform is probably the biggest issue of the 21st century,' Rep. Kurt Schrader (D-OR) reportedly said at an 'Immigration Day Action' event this weekend. 'It will decide who is in charge of this country for the next 20 or 30 years.'"
Now, this is no big news. What's big about this is a Democrat has let the cat slip out of the bag. Of course this is what amnesty's all about: continuing to populate a never-ending in perpetuity underclass in America voting for Democrats. This Democrat, Kurt Schrader, has just admitted what amnesty's all about, making sure the Democrats are in power for 30 years.
I've been telling people for I don't know how many years, you know it as well as I do that's what this is all about. But no Democrat's ever admitted it. They've always said it's about human rights or it's about the economy, it's been creating jobs, it's about economic growth, it's all this other rotgut drivel. The Chamber of Commerce has said the same thing. But it's not about any of that.
It's about creating voters, underclass, undereducated, ill-skilled, and low-income people that are always gonna be subservient and loyal to the Democrat Party, because the Democrat Party needs a permanent underclass. They need as many people in poverty as they can get. And to the extent that people in this country escape poverty via economic opportunity when Democrats are not in the White House, that pool of the underclass gets smaller and smaller, plus the Democrats are aborting a good percentage of their future voter population, so that's why they need amnesty. And this guy has just openly admitted it at something called the Immigration Day Action event.
The single biggest issue for Millennials in this century, because it's about who is going to control the country for the next 30 years. How many Millennials or young people who are all for amnesty because they think it's a human rights issue, how many of them do you think would be shocked to hear this? (interruption) I always imagine this. I imagine every day a group of Millennials tuning in for first, second, third time, hearing me. They arrive to the program with a preconceived misconception about me based on what they've heard about me in the media. And nevertheless they find the program and they think I'll full of it and they hate me and think I'm racist, sexist, bigot, homophobe and they think all of you are too and all of that.
Then all of a sudden this subject comes up, and I thoroughly dispel the idea that illegal immigration and amnesty is human rights issue, that all it is is a Democrat Party scheme to control the country for 30 years, I wonder how they react to that? When they hear somebody say it has nothing to do with human rights, has nothing to do with jobs, nothing to do with expanding our economy, nothing to do with any of the drivel that's used to sell it, that it's all about control of the country for the next 30 years, I wonder what their reaction to it is.
Maybe someday I'll know. And it probably depends whether I yell or don't, because when I yell I scare off the 24-, 25-year-old women. So I've been told. The men, I think, can probably take it, but I wouldn't make bets on that, either, now that I think about it.
I’m baffled why there isn’t more resistance.
We’re on the brink of losing our country and most people don’t seem to care. I guess until it affects them personally they’d rather just ignore it.
We will become like Brazil or Venezuela.
Banana republic except without bananas.
“...illegal immigrants is the ‘civil rights battle’ for Millennials that will decide who controls the country for the next three decades.”
Not the next three decades, the next three centuries.
The Republican nominee in the last 4 elections has been an amnesty supporter. Romney tried to hide it during the campaign, but came clean shortly after supporting last year’s Rubio Gang amnesty bill.
When the GOP nominates another amnesty candidate, he will lose. No amount of castigation, cajoling, coaxing or threatening or insults will make Jeb Bush President.
Or any other cheap labor importer.
Get your sentence straight. I can’t tell what makes me, iyo, “part of the problem”.
Romney was not a viable alternative to Obama, to call those who recognized that part of the problem
is reprehensible.
you let Harry Reid win!or some such bilge that the
vote (R) at any costcrowd pushes.
F— them and their entitlement-mentality.
Don't you mean a banana republic with out the republic?
If the dems get away with this, and those RINO bastards Boehner and McConnell are helping them, this Country will be. Banana Republic in ten years.
You do realize that those aren't Republicans In Name Only, they are the true face of the Republican party.
You and I, people who might vote for someone else (rather than the R) are the real RINOs.
Secret Ballot.
I guess we won’t have either, don’t think you can grow banans this far north.
That is one hell of an assumption you are making. However, the GOPe IS THE PROBLEM!
Voting for them, sitting on ones ass, or voting Mickey Mouse really makes no difference now does it?
as to how I voted, check my history, it’ll tell you.
And I won’t be making that mistake again. Don’t blame me for the GOPe forcing weak looser on the rest of us.
I thought we were talking metaphorical bananas, as in that guy's bananas!
I should think we have enough insanity in the legal system alone to make that true.
Everyone with two brain cells to rub together knows that the Democrats are counting on new Mexican voters to put the Democratic party over the top and keep them there for the next decade or two.
Going back more than two hundred years, political corruption doesn’t get much more blatant than this.
Romney would have been 10,000 times better than that arrogant pos
Kiss your Gringo ass goodbye.
That’s a racial slur.
Isn’t that against the rules of FR?
Howso? Name three major policies he would be significantly different on.
(That is, nothing about how he carries himself, how he presents himself, who/what he endorses politically... only what he actually DOES.)
Hey! New Mexico is a fine place!
(Yeah, capitalization does make a difference.)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.