“I am the libertarian traditionalist Catholic ...”
That self-description reveals a raging, unresolvable conflict within the Judge right there.
What can you hold against a man that is well read, knows both sides of an issue sincerely, but rejects yours?
Chesterton was admired and respected by his most ardent opponents similarly. That is our Christian/Jewish ideal!
Yes, we believe our side is more right by far and ought be the way of the land, but if your opponent is honest, knowledgeable about your own points, and still disagrees, then at least you ought respect him as a person.
The judge is doing that with Jon and is that himself. Praise that!!!
Two not-low-information voters!
Just what we whine about needing!
Maybe my personal dictatorship WOULD make me happier after all?
A traditionalist Catholic such as the judge is okay with queer marriage and legalizing marijuana reefer, retard sticks? Would St. Thomas Acquinas approve?
Do all or just some libertarians believe in the use of recreational drugs?