Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DirtyPigpen
Do you even know what you typed? This is you from the earlier thread. You say they do have the means to take us on long term. Earlier in this thread you say they don’t.

No, and everything that you have posted proves that.

Now you already agree that I say that they are currently too weak to take on NATO effectively, in a actual war, which is clear.

Now show me the words where I also said that they currently ARE strong enough to take us on, and in a long term fight.

Can you do that for us?

144 posted on 02/15/2015 9:55:29 PM PST by ansel12 (Palin--Mr President, the only thing that stops a bad guy with a nuke is a good guy with a nuke.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies ]


To: ansel12

Yeah, this part: “ You are basackwards when you say that they have neither the will or the means to take us on long term, that is EXACTLY the opposite of the reality....”

You even capitalized some of it.

Do you even have integrity enough to admit that in the other thread you were touting their strength in order to enforce your position on why we should help Ukraine? You go into troop strength and how formidable they are and how dangerous it would be to have them any closer to NATO boarders. Even though during the height of the cold war they were much stronger and even closer. Albeit, not as strong as we thought or at least they hoped we thought.

Then in this thread you say they are not much of a threat.

We just need to stay out of it unless they’d like to purchase some of our arms.


147 posted on 02/15/2015 10:08:27 PM PST by DirtyPigpen (Semper Fi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson