Yeah, this part: “ You are basackwards when you say that they have neither the will or the means to take us on long term, that is EXACTLY the opposite of the reality....”
You even capitalized some of it.
Do you even have integrity enough to admit that in the other thread you were touting their strength in order to enforce your position on why we should help Ukraine? You go into troop strength and how formidable they are and how dangerous it would be to have them any closer to NATO boarders. Even though during the height of the cold war they were much stronger and even closer. Albeit, not as strong as we thought or at least they hoped we thought.
Then in this thread you say they are not much of a threat.
We just need to stay out of it unless they’d like to purchase some of our arms.
Cute, now here is what was actually said that you cut off and replaced with dots....the part about the "means", not currently being there.
"as we are right this minute discussing their current military operations as part of the process of displaying that will, that goal, and to reestablish those means."
To: DirtyPigpen
That’s right Russia was a greater threat, a threat that was defeated, and broken, and now you are supporting them rebuilding by reconquering.
You are basackwards when you say that they have neither the will or the means to take us on long term, that is EXACTLY the opposite of the reality, as we are right this minute discussing their current military operations as part of the process of displaying that will, that goal, and to reestablish those means.
64 posted on 2/15/2015, 11:38:52 AM by ansel12