[Libloather]

Muslim bakeries will have to provide kosher products. Can’t wait.

[armydawg505]

Tolerance and compassion are traits liberals only reserve for other liberals.

[Texicanus]

A simple solution for the bakery owners is to have taken the order and subcontracted it to another baker or bakery who specializes in gay wedding cakes. Just tell the customer you cannot bake the cake for whatever reason (including religious beliefs), but you’ll have it special ordered for them and directly delivered to their wedding.

Whether anyone knows it or not, the bakery business employs many gay and lesbian cooks. many who would be proud to handle a special order of this nature. It shouldn’t be too hard to find one.

The two lesbos and the judge would never go for such a simple solution. It is obvious their intent is to inflict as much financial damage and humiliation on the Christians business owners for their religious beliefs. And they are twisting and misinterpreting the Oregon business laws to justify their case.

I know many will argue that the bakery owner’s beliefs are compromised even by subcontracting the cake order to someone else. I don’t believe they are condoning a sin by doing this. Instead, I think they wish to avoid judgement of the sinners and do not wish to be a part of the sin by baking them a cake. It’s a fine line either way. I wonder how King Solomon would have ruled in this situation?

But subcontracting is legal in Oregon as far as I know unless prohibited by some obscure law. It is an alternate way of delivering a service or product when there are reasons why the business owners cannot fill the order themselves. The bakery owners should never be forced by law to sell or deliver a product that is not in their best interests.

[dila813]

Everyone should find a secular baker and request a devil cake that says LGBT Activists will burn in hell

[terycarl]

I will NEVER be able to understand who would eat a cake that they had forced someone to bake for them....good grief, it could, and probably would, contain anything.....and the pleasure of informing them of that fact AFTER the party would be all the reward I needed!!!

[Political Junkie Too]

Last week, South Carolina Circuit Court Judge Diane S. Goodstein ruled in The Diocese of South Carolina vs The Episcopal Church of the United States that the First Amendment grants a "freedom to disassociate."

From the article:

---

The Court found that “the Constitution and Canons of TEC have no provisions which state that a member diocese cannot voluntarily withdraw its membership.” The ruling found that had there been such a provision, it would have violated the Diocese’s “constitutionally-protected right” to freedom of association. “With the freedom to associate goes its corollary, the freedom to disassociate,” Judge Goodstein said.

---

This woman was exercising her freedom to disassociate when she chose not to bake a cake for a purpose she did not agree with.

She should take this to the Supreme hunt on First Amendment grounds. Apparently, South Carolina's freedom to disassociate is Oregon's discrimination.

-PJ

[Salvation]

If you would like more information about what's happening in Oregon, please FReepmail me.

I lost my Oregon list when my computer crashed last year, so please send me your name by FReepmail if you want to be on this list.

[Clinging Bitterly]

An administrative law judge in Oregon (and most other states) is a "judge" in name only and does not hold anything close to a legitimate court of law, rather it is a manner of enforcement of the rules of unelected bureaucrats - which as we see here, are too often matters of such consequence they are properly matters which belong in the sphere of the legislative body, and genuine courts of law.

In short, anyone brought before one of these fictitious judges in Oregon, is being railroaded by the government.

It is a system which needs to be scrapped.

[Elsie]

Baker Who Ran Business Based on Her Christian Faith Discriminated Against Lesbians

GOOD!!!