Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Congress should shut down over this. How much more despotism can go on? FUND NOTHING!

The only thing they should be doing is having this guy impeached.


2 posted on 02/14/2015 8:12:16 PM PST by Shadow44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Shadow44

This entire “administration” has been a series of Reischstag Fires. If not halted, the outcome will be a replay of Germany of the 1930s!

Am I the only guy who believes this current turmoil has been orchestrated by Obama and his flunkies to serve as YET ANOTHER racially charged diversion to the DOZENS of ongoing Obama scandals, the recent immigration mess and the building crisis in the Middle East. Obama is well on the way to marginalizing the white population here with millions of new minority citizens who will soon become the new majority (and predominately welfare “beneficiaries” and DEMOCRAT VOTERS).
Jefferson – and other founders – greatly feared what that would do to America!

Estimate is that the “benefits” Obama will provide for them will cost YOU and your fellow tax slaves over 2 BILLION bucks per year. Helpful tip from Lois Lerner: Better plan to file and pay early!
(Isn’t it time for the FAIRTAX??)

“Whom God would destroy, He first makes mad!”
America lost its mind. It then elected a MADMAN as POTUS!


10 posted on 02/14/2015 8:37:04 PM PST by Dick Bachert (This entire "administration" has been a series of Reischstag Fires. We know how that turned out!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Shadow44; All
"How much more despotism can go on? FUND NOTHING!"

By passing the Domecratic vote-winning but constitutionally indefensible Stimulus and Obamacare program bills, Obama’s first Democratic-controlled Congress criminally defeated the purpose of the Founding States' “power of the purse” clause, the Constitution’s Clause 1 of Section 7 of Article I, that clause giving the House the power to stop funding for unpopular spending programs.

The benefit to Democrats of passing these spending programs is that lawless Obama can fund his constitutionally indefensible projects with worrying about Congress cutting off funds for them.

And while Congress can arguably still stop Obama’s spending programs with legislation, I don’t see the RINO-controlled Congress exercising its constitutional Article I, Section 7, Clause 2 power to override presidential vetoes to do so.

12 posted on 02/14/2015 8:44:27 PM PST by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Shadow44; All

Why not print this questionaire up encircle your answers and send it to your US Senator

Dear Senator
INS...Amnesty.. Forget about Ebola
We don’t allow cattle to enter without a background health and ancestry check which we also reqiure of legal immigrants who wait years and still go thru health and record checks. We also require that any legal immingrant demonstrate prior to entry that they offer a contribution to our society and not dependency upon it .

Yet we’re letting children and gang bangers in without doing any of this which has resulted in dispersing virulent new diseases (measles) and drug use which has resulted in unreported cases in schools where these illegal kids were placed.. Plus shoved a severe financial strain on local governments where they are placed .

Should any candidate for Attorney General supporting that practice be denied confirmation ?(Yes) (No) .Should those given this bypassed favored treatment who miss their INS hearing be deported fortwith ? (Y) (N).. ? Denied re-entry (Y)(N) ?

In “countries where an American citizen decides to be a “legal” emigree never mind being a seasonal visitor still are denied voting privledges. Own land in their own name. Face steep fines before getting kicked out let alone denied income and energy subsistance including food stamps, or bring in family members .

I (do) (don’t) believe we should allow such full citizenship privledges mentioned above which are denied by the country of national origin of the above, to a legal American immigrant , deny such full citizen privledges to any (emigree) (seasonal vistor) (illegal) if their country does not allow those same privledges to any citizen of the United States, .
While such a position will be condemed as defacto deportation particularly by the political establishment .Would you continue to support a Senator who refuses to support such restrictions ? (Y) (N) Does that also include erecting border barriers such as fencing designed to discourage surrepticious or uncontolled entry ? (Yes) (No)

Should any American citizen which goes overseas to join a foreign entity fighting against the United States (such as ISIS) Be denied re-entry (Y)(N) and their citizenship revoked? (Y) (N) Should that person be charged with treason (Y)(N)

Very Truly Yours For Restoring the value of American citizenship and Conservative Government

Include your return address label below along with your signature and date


27 posted on 02/14/2015 11:14:21 PM PST by mosesdapoet (Some of my best rebuttals are in FR's along with meaningless venting no one reads.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson