“Banning interracial marriage may be daft and ultimately undefinable, but saner states are free to attract citizens who don’t want daft laws on marriage—that’s our defense against stupid laws, not Federal ambulance chasing. Hard cases make bad law, and ultimately destroy the Constitution.”
The hard reality is that bans on gay marriage are going to be ruled unconstitutional and a violation of civil rights.
The court, I think, is not viewing this issue through the lens of what’s acceptable by God or anything in the Bible.
It’s being looked as any two individuals. Do two individuals have the right to marry. If they do then gender doesn’t come into play.
It’s being looked as any two individuals.
Not disagreeing with what you're saying. What I'm saying is that this is a culture war of the centuries. In a war, you don't accept the enemy's premises, which you correctly identify above. I'm not saying this is easy or quick. Just that it's our job to wear down the culture with our premises instead of theirs.
We're in this for the long—very long—haul, as in "The gates of hell shall not prevail against it." Praise God and pass the ammo.