To: betty boop
To address your non Crevo comments:
1) I hope you are well and happy :)
2) Vaxxer is people who won’t vaccinate their kids
3) <> is math for Not Equal To
4) My tag specifically repudiates AGW in the simplest scientific methodology terms. AGW matches exactly zero criteria for a Scientific Theory — my tag is just one example
Take care and again a blessed day to you.
34 posted on
02/13/2015 12:55:41 PM PST by
freedumb2003
(AGW: Settled Science? If so, there would only be one model and it would agree with measurements)
To: freedumb2003; Alamo-Girl; marron; hosepipe; xzins; YHAOS; MHGinTN; TXnMA; metmom; thouworm
AGW matches exactly zero criteria for a Scientific Theory Well we certainly agree about that!
So, how do you regard Darwin's theory? Is it even "scientific" by these same criteria?
35 posted on
02/13/2015 4:51:22 PM PST by
betty boop
(Say good-bye to mathematical logic if you wish to preserve your relations with concrete realities!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson