If you want on/off this ping list, please let me know.
Please beware, this is a high-volume ping list!
CRUZ or LOSE!Posted on 02/09/2015 4:59:54 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
The Republican presidential primary field is shaping up to have about a dozen contenders in 2016, and U.S. Sen. Ted Cruz of Texas may become one of them. But if Cruz decides to mount a campaign, his biggest strength -- strong support among conservative, tea party voters – may also be his biggest liability.
While he hasn’t yet officially announced a run for president, Cruz has said he is strongly considering it. In October, he made a visit to the Wichita, Kansas, headquarters of the oil billionaire Koch brothers to make the case that Republicans need a grassroots conservative as their nominee in 2016, according to the New York Times. He’s also hired staff in the key early states of Iowa, New Hampshire and South Carolina -- a strong signal that he's serious.
Cruz’s reputation as a uncompromising firebrand who shut down the federal government over the debt ceiling has made him a hero of the tea party. And these are the kind of voters who are the likeliest to turn out for primaries in 2016.
“If there’s Texas grit, Ted’s got it,” said political consultant Suzanne Bellsynder of the Austin, Texas-based Bellsnynder Group, who worked with Cruz when they were both staffers, he in the state attorney general’s office and she in the Texas state Senate. “He’s one of the people who’s relentless. He’s works hard, he’s smart, he’s not afraid to take on things that are a little bit edgy … and primary voters are looking for that kind of leadership.”
If that is what Republicans are looking for, they don’t know it yet. Cruz is running in the low single digits in the latest polls in Iowa and New Hampshire, the first caucus and primary states. To improve his standing, he’s going to have to broaden his appeal beyond the tea party, according to Bruce Buchanan, a political science professor at the University of Texas at Austin.
“This is an amazingly talented fellow. Tons of energy, but he’s at this moment almost more of a message politician in that he has a point of view but not an extraordinary base of support outside the state of Texas, where he is quite popular,” Buchanan said. “He hasn’t displayed the ability yet nor had the opportunity to display the willingness to build coalitions toward the center right now, and that’s what he’ll have to do to move to a position of greater credibility. The establishment wants to win in 2016, and now he looks like a fringe candidate that sets up for defeat.”
As Cruz considers a 2016 run, the main focus right now is finding donors. Cruz should have no trouble with what Bellsnyder calls “heart donors,” or those who contribute to candidates who align with their political views. But he may struggle with “investment donors” with deep pockets who want a viable candidate.
“They may like him, they may believe in him and what he’s trying to do. But from the donor perspective, they’re making a decision on what’s a good business decision for them,” Bellsnyder said. “In a lot of ways, fundraising is marketing. You have to show people how you’re going to get there.”
While Cruz has been touted for offering ethnic diversity -- his father was born in Cuba -- his position against granting a path to citizenship for illegal immigrants hasn’t played well with many Hispanic voters. There are no exit polls from Cruz’s 2012 Senate victory, but an ImpreMedia/Latino Decisions poll the day before the election showed only 35 percent of self-identified Latinos supported Cruz -- only six points better than the 29 percent GOP presidential nominee Mitt Romney received among Latinos in Texas. He also only got 26 percent support among naturalized citizens and 26 percent of the Spanish-speaking vote in Texas.
Cruz’ showing among Texas Hispanics in 2012 doesn't bode well for his chances in 2016, when the group will be one of the key voting blocs in a general election. Hispanics in Texas are heavily Mexican-American and Cubans are a significant bloc only in Florida, where they will have their own favorite son if Sen. Marco Rubio runs. Jeb Bush also has run well with Florida Hispanics.
Another knock on Cruz is his inexperience, having only been in the Senate for a little more than two years. His swift ascent from unknown to rising star mimics the path of President Barack Obama, who also had less than one term in the Senate when he was first elected in 2008. The Senate is Cruz’s only elected political office; he served as the appointed solicitor general of Texas from 2003 to 2008.
“The ‘young man in a hurry’ charge will come up for sure,” Buchanan said.
It has already been lobbed at Cruz. Without mentioning him by name, former Texas Gov. Rick Perry, a potential rival in 2016, recently said he thinks the American people are “going to make a rather radical shift away from a young, untested United States senator whose policies have really failed,” according to the Washington Post.
Kick Butt Senator.” Cruz or lose”. No mercy on these rino weaklings!!
Cruz to VICTORY!
Cruz/Walker 2016.
Cruz needs to appeal to the Elizabeth Warren voters. They claim to object to crony capitalism, and Cruz will work to end that cozy but corrupt relationship. They claim to care about union workers and the unemployed, and Cruz can help both groups. The question is: Can Cruz articulate why conservatism is good for all honest people, and can he use that narrative to appeal to even a tenth of Romney’s casually dismissed “47%”.
Wow. Well, there you have it. Rare for them to be so frank.
an ImpreMedia/Latino Decisions poll the day before the election showed only 35 percent of self-identified Latinos supported Cruz -- only six points better than the 29 percent GOP presidential nominee Mitt Romney received among Latinos in Texas. He also only got 26 percent support among naturalized citizens and 26 percent of the Spanish-speaking vote in Texas.
I agree with you. If he takes 35% of the hispanic vote he walks away with it.
He’s already working on it, and it’s driving the Left nuts:
Insane, Lying Ted Cruz Insists That Democrats are The One Percent Party
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-gop/3255716/posts
So how them moderate RINO's been working out come election time?? Or is that the point, that you want the GOPe to continue nominating doomed leftist pussies whose only stomach for a fight is with conservatives, so R's can keep losing? (Not you, 2DV)
We don’t even need to appeal to moderates to win, we can win simply by nominating a candidate that energizes the base and drives up our turnout.
IIRC, I read that he actually won about 40%. Comme ci comme ça.
The Cruzer got 130,000 fewer votes than the unloved Mitt from Mass in Texas. He needs to work on the outpouring of Latino love.
Oh noes!
A captive Chamber Of Amnesty publication is worried Jeb might not get nominated.
CRUZ or LOSE!Wishful dreaming by the GOP-E Chamber of Commerce Traitors!
It was 40, the threshold, and all Cruz has to say is ‘Yeah, I’m a freshman Senator, and I need you to help me repeal, rollback, defund, destroy all the things that *other* one-term Senator has done.’
The UNIPARTY scum are in for a rude awakening.
Curious.
Not long ago, there were similar article about Jeb, with an almost opposite conjecture:
Jeb’s weaknesses for the primaries are his stremgths for the general election.
Reagan had exactly the SAME PROBLEM.
He was LOVED during the Primaries, but so EXTREME that he could never win in November...
Yeah, I dreamed the part where I worked for him.
Thank you for saying it. Reagan did have the same problem and I suspect that the results will be the similar. They keep saying that conservative principles only win in primaries but lose general elections. We have absolutely no proof of that. In fact, we have proof of the opposite. The more conservative the candidate or at least the more conservative people felt the candidate was, the better the showing in the general election.
George W. Bush did not run as liberal George Bush the Elder II. He ran as a “compassionate” conservative. He won because he was perceived to be conservative. Reagan, who actually was conservative, won by large margins, twice. Liberal George Bush the Elder won the first time because people believed he would continue Reagan’s conservative principles. He lost the second election when people realized just how liberal he was.
Every time a liberal republican has run for office since, they have lost. Dole, McCain, Romney — moderate and liberals lose. Yet, the liberals (GOPe, Dems and their minions) keep making the claim that conservatives can’t win the general election.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.