It is also the right of the society to determine what risks to said society they are willing to tolerate. Diseases are not necessarily protected by the constitution. There are times when it becomes an imperative to require everyone in said society to join in an effort to eradicate a biological enemy.
Do you believe that the government has a right to require everyone who comes into this country to show proof of vaccination to certain communicable diseases? Or are you OK with just letting anyone in?
The government has the Responsibility to Check everyone coming into the Nation but in no way does it have the right to stop a citizen without probable cause and proof that person is committing /committed a crime and the last time I checked Living is not a crime.
Are you aware that if a person bites you or an officer the government cannot force a blood test (think aids)? Well then there goes that Concept they have the ability or Authority to force someone to take a shot. Possibly/arguably it can place a requirement on government building/property where proof may be required before entry but even this is a stretch because of the whole public property/access thing... But remember we are so far from a Constitutional, Small Government of the People that most have trouble grasping the concepts of Freedom (and Responsibility).
By the way do you have an answer to my question? Because the answer to this question solves the problem...
“I really want to hear how those who wish to force vaccines on others believe they have the Right to do so especially when they are immune to it from the shot already?”