If you want on/off this ping list, please let me know.
Please beware, this is a high-volume ping list!
CRUZ or LOSE!Posted on 02/06/2015 4:22:10 AM PST by HomerBohn
Senator Ted Cruz (R-Texas), a steadfast opponent of the Obama administration’s use of executive actions to grant amnesty to illegal aliens, is facing opposition from members of his own party in his attempt to delay a Senate vote to confirm Loretta Lynch — President Obama’s nominee for attorney general — until the White House reverses itself on the executive actions.
Cruz explained his position in a statement made to Politico in the Capitol on February 3:
For several months now, I have called on the Senate majority leader to halt confirmations of every nominee executive and judicial, other than vital national security positions, unless or until the president rescinds his unconstitutional amnesty. We have an opportunity in front of us right now with Loretta Lynch — a nominee for attorney general — who has fully embraced and flat-out promised to implement the unconstitutional amnesty.
Politico reported the following day that Cruz’s proposal has been rejected by several influential GOP senators, including his Texas colleague, Senate Majority Whip John Cornyn.
The Dallas News quoted a statement made by Cornyn in a call with Texas reporters on February 4, explaining that although he opposes Lynch as a nominee for attorney, unlike Cruz, he wants the nomination brought to a vote:
I will oppose that nomination. While [Lynch] has an impressive record as a United States attorney, as you know she will become the chief advocate for the president’s policies as attorney general. And her testimony, expressing support for the president’s unconstitutional executive action and her support for a number of the president’s other policies, make it impossible for me to vote for her nomination.
Up to that point, Cornyn and Cruz are in agreement. However, reported both the Dallas Morning News and Politico, Cornyn said that he rejected Cruz’s proposed strategy. “I don’t think [the Lynch nomination and the Obama executive actions] should be coupled together, no,” he said.
Last week, Cruz said in a statement to CQ Roll Call that the success or failure of the Lynch nomination would be determined by Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) noting that McConnell could refuse to bring her nomination to the floor.
Cruz also asked his fellow Republicans on the Judiciary Committee to vote against Lynch. “If every Republican on the Judiciary Committee votes ‘no,’ Ms. Lynch’s confirmation will be defeated,” said Cruz. “Likewise, if Republican leadership chooses not to report the nomination to the floor, Ms. Lynch’s nomination will be defeated.”
However, despite Cruz’s plea, McConnell has said that Lynch will “absolutely” get a vote in the Senate, but declined to comment further.
Other influential Republicans are also opposed to Cruz’s plan. Senator Orrin Hatch (R-Utah), who is the presiident pro tempore of the Senate, has said he intends to vote to approve the Lynch nomination, offering justification for his position based on the “at least she’s not Holder” argument. “Republicans have been complaining about Eric Holder for a long time; this is an opportunity to make that change,” said Hatch. “I don’t think we should delay it at all. I think we ought to get her over there and get her working.”
When Senator Jeff Flake (R-Ariz.), was asked about Cruz’s strategy, he responded: “That’s not my position.”
Like Hatch, Flake has also said that he will support Lynch’s confirmation, saying: “The president ought to get his people as long as there’s no disqualifying substance there, and I don’t think there is with her.”
Flake’s stand is not surprising, considering that he was one of the bipartisan “Gang of Eight” that drafted Border Security, Economic Opportunity, and Immigration Modernization Act of 2013 that passed the Senate but was never voted on by the House.
Obama used the House’s failure to pass the Senate bill as justification to turn to the executive order route to accomplish the failed legislation’s objectives, saying that his solution was for Congress to “pass a bill…. The truth is that the Senate did a good job in crafting a bipartisan [“Gang of Eight”] bill that would have greatly improved our immigration system, and my preference is for a legislative solution to this problem.”
The “Gang of Eight Bill” (which granted amnesty to many illegal immigrants) was not Flake’s first venture into drafting amnesty-based legislation. Back in 2007, when he was still a representative, he joined Representative Luis Guitierrez (D-Ill.), one of the House’s most outspoken advocates of amnesty for illegal aliens, in sponsoring legislation that included a “path to legalization” (amnesty) for “undocumented” (illegal) immigrants.
“I applaud my friends Rep. Flake and Gutierrez for moving forward on immigration reform,” the late former Senator Edward Kennedy said in a statement in advance of the bill’s introduction. “They are our valued partners in this effort to forge a tough but fair bill that strikes the right balance between protecting our security, strengthening our economy, and enacting laws that uphold our humanity.”
Kennedy had partnered with Senator John McCain (R-Ariz.), who would go on to become another “Gang of Eight” member, in drafting a Senate bill that also provided amnesty for illegal immigrants.
Not surprisingly, McCain also opposes Cruz’s strategy, saying: “I don’t think [Cruz’s plan] works. I don’t think [Lynch’s confirmation and the Obama executive orders are] connected. I think we have an advise and consent role, and she should be judged on her merits or demerits.”
Republicans are now engaged in an uphill battle in the Senate to bring up a vote on a House-passed funding bill for the Department of Homeland Security that would repeal President Obama’s executive actions granting amnesty to five million illegal immigrants. While Republicans control the Senate, with 54 members, they are short of the 60 votes needed to end a Democratic filibuster and bring legislation to the floor for a vote. A recent vote to advance the Homeland Security funding bill got only 51 votes, showing that Senate Republicans are not even unified on that measure.
With Cruz’s proposal meeting so much resistance from members of his own party, it is apparent that the GOP lacks the unified resolve necessary to stop the Obama program to grant amnesty to millions of illegal immigrants.
Most Republicans are just weak kneed go alongs who care for nothing except keeping their positions of status and power at any cost. Sad but true.
There is not one reason for any Republican to vote to confirm Loretta Lynch as AG. They need to just say no and let Barry put up another candidate. But that would take some courage and effort. Not much but some. And Mitch McConnell does not even have some courage.
Third party period. The Republicans are cowards and pussies. Lets create a Conservative party and take out the Whigs.
Yep.
I just frustrating that with each election, it’s just throw this party out, put this party in, but in the end it’s a matter of meet the new boss, same as the old boss.
Nothing changes. All we are doing is electing the exact same tyrant government, no matter what name it hides behind.
It’s a shell game, and under every shell the prize is we lose.
It’s depressing. My outlook is not at all rosy. I hope I’m wrong.
CRUZ or LOSE!Rino’s are in all out war against conservatives; they care nothing for our country; they think denying Cruz will make him look weak unable to accomplish anything, they are MAD with power and are increasingly fearful of man who is honorable; it only makes the Rino’s appear as they really are; weak, full of fear and traitorous.
Down with the enemy within.
Support Cruz 2016!
There is not one reason for any Republican to vote to confirm Loretta Lynch as AG. They need to just say no and let Barry put up another candidate. But that would take some courage and effort. Not much but some. And Mitch McConnell does not even have some courage.
AGREE 100%!
She is an Eric Holder clone...in fact, she and Mrs Holder started a black sorority together, at Harvard. Her activist roots run deep.
There should not be ONE single R vote for this Holder retread. Let 0bola tire of nominating AG’s...until he stops nominating socialists or his term runs out...which ever comes first.
Imagine if Sens Cruz and Lee - and other conservatives - announced just that idea. Open the floodgates.
Any questions?
The Republicans gave us obama, not conservatives. When you don’t offer a choice people are not going to waste their time.
When in the last 15 yrs. has the Republican party rolled back anything???????????????????????????????????????????
They had control of the whole government under Bush43 at one point and expanded liberalism and government at a staggering pace.
I am not surprised at all to see the Republican clamoring to vote for Holder in drag. Sadly some conservatives still believe the lies. The Republican party is not going to change this governments behavior anymore than the Democrat party would. Both are corrupt and rotten to the core. Only a new second party will stop the destruction.
Exactly. You win the thread.
To your comment and most of the fifty I can only say, Yes, me too.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.