SHOW ME DATA IN GEORGIA OR THE ENTIRE UNITED STATES THAT SHOWS A 300% GREATER INCIDENCE OF AUTISM FOR BLACK MALES IN THE OVERALL POPULATION.
Yes, I know the data that showed in their sample that was discarded. But it should be infinitely easy to show that black males are 300% more likely to have autism than any other group in the overall population.
The data was properly discarded, it has been written about extensively, it incorporated inoculation records of a sample group that included a federally funded pre-school program for autistic black males which required immunization to enroll. Yes, this data was tossed. BECAUSE IT DOES NOT PAN OUT FOR THE GREATER POPULATION. It is bad data, unless you've got some evidence to show it isn't?
I'm waiting...
How do you expect me to show you something the CDC has admitted to throwing away?
Are you daft?
Show me Lois Lerner’s hard drives!
(see how that works?)