To: Swordmaker
You are wrong because the 2nd century manuscript called Gospel of the Hebrews stated that Jesus gave ‘’ the linen cloth ‘’ to the servant of the priest and the he appeared to James his brother. This is the shroud of turin they are writing about but not many people know about Gospel of the hebrews, its evidence of the Turin Shroud from 2nd century hidden from the world by corrupt historians and news media who hate the Shroud of Turin. This proves God wanted the Shroud or Shrouds now to be protected as evidence in this Godless world to be made visible not to be worshipped but to be respected and leave you in awe its made by God not man, no commandments have been broken by people who revere these cloths
69 posted on
02/03/2015 6:30:24 AM PST by
purcre
(second shroud discovered vatican veronica veil)
To: purcre
You are wrong because the 2nd century manuscript called Gospel of the Hebrews stated that Jesus gave the linen cloth to the servant of the priest and the he appeared to James his brother. This is the shroud of turin they are writing about but not many people know about Gospel of the hebrews, its evidence of the Turin Shroud from 2nd century hidden from the world by corrupt historians and news media who hate the Shroud of Turin. This proves God wanted the Shroud or Shrouds now to be protected as evidence in this Godless world to be made visible not to be worshipped but to be respected and leave you in awe its made by God not man, no commandments have been broken by people who revere these cloths Why would I be wrong for criticizing someone who claims he would most likely destroy it? Perhaps you addressed this to the wrong person?
80 posted on
02/03/2015 11:50:47 AM PST by
Swordmaker
(This tag line is a Microsoft insult free zone... but if the insults to Mac users contnue...)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson